Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:

-Ohio-

Citation:

WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.

Hide Topics and Issues column This search returned 369 rows. Rows per page:

07/13/2026 Case Announcements

Motion and procedural rulings.

7/13/2026

2026-Ohio-2643

07/13/2026 Case Announcements #2

Appeals not accepted for review.

7/13/2026

2026-Ohio-2672

07/13/2026 Case Announcements #3

Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals.

7/13/2026

2026-Ohio-2681

State v. Polizzi

2024-0312

Criminal law—Sentencing—R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)—Consecutive-sentencing findings—R.C. 2953.08(G)(2)—Appellate review of consecutive sentences—Proportionality review does not require courts to consider the total number of consecutive sentences and the resulting aggregate prison term when imposing or reviewing consecutive sentences—A trial court may consider the offender’s overall conduct and the harm caused by his or her crimes when imposing consecutive sentences—On appeal, appellate court examines only whether trial court’s findings supporting consecutive sentences are clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record and whether the sentence otherwise is contrary to law—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed.

Shanahan, J.

Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2588

7/10/2026

2026-Ohio-2588

State ex rel. Mobley v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

2025-0608

Mandamus—Public-records requests—R.C. 149.43—Public-records requester sought records from a public county office, which denied the request on basis that it was duplicative of an earlier request from requester that had already been fulfilled by another county office—Court of appeals granted county office’s motion to dismiss because requested record was provided after lawsuit was filed—In denying requester’s request for statutory damages, court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in concluding that based on existing case law, county office reasonably would have believed that its denial of public-records request was not a failure to comply with its obligation under R.C. 149.43(B)—Court of appeals’ judgment dismissing writ claim as moot and dismissing request for statutory damages affirmed.

DeWine, J.

Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2589

7/10/2026

2026-Ohio-2589

...