Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 214 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Johnson v. Durrani C-250064EXPERT TESTIMONY — STANDARD OF CARE — DEFENDANT’S ABSENCE — JURY INSTRUCTION — JOINT TRIAL —PREJUDGMENT INTEREST — ATTORNEY FEES: The trial court erred by permitting an expert neuroradiologist to testify to a surgeon’s standard of care involving operative notes where the expert’s testimony did not establish that he was qualified to testify about whether a surgeon’s failure to write an operative note breached the standard of care, but that error was harmless because the jury interrogatories showed that the expert’s testimony involving operative notes had no effect on the jury’s verdict. The trial court erred by instructing the jury that it was required to make an adverse inference against defendant based on defendant’s absence from trial, but that error was harmless because the instructions as a whole informed the jury that inferences were permissive. The trial court did not err in awarding plaintiff prejudgment interest where defendant’s argument on appeal that plaintiff failed to make a pretrial settlement offer was refuted by defendant’s arguments before the trial court. The trial court erred in awarding plaintiff attorney fees following a jury verdict on plaintiff’s claim for negligence where attorney fees were not authorized by statute, a contract, or a finding of bad faith or malice on defendant’s part.BockHamilton 10/14/2026 10/14/2026 2026-Ohio-4036
State v. Rodriguez C-240075CHILD ENDANGERING—INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE—JURY INSTRUCTIONS—VERDICT FORMS—FAILURE TO OJBECT: Where Ohio law does not require jury instructions or verdict forms to include the factual context of each count when a defendant is charged with multiple counts of the same offense, trial counsel were not ineffective for failing to object to jury instructions and verdict forms that did not factually differentiate the counts.CrouseHamilton 10/14/2026 10/14/2026 2026-Ohio-4035
State v. Anderson C-260031, C-260032CRIM.R. 11 — DISCOVERY — INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL: Defendant’s guilty pleas were knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered because the trial court complied with Crim.R. 11 and defendant failed to show that he entered the pleas under pressure or duress. Trial counsel was not ineffective for failing to provide discovery materials to defendant or stating that defendant’s charges could be reduced at trial while representing him in pleading guilty, because defendant failed to show that he was prejudiced.KinsleyHamilton 10/9/2026 10/9/2026 2026-Ohio-3974
State v. Cornist C-260085ASSAULT — INEFFECTIVE ASSITANCE OF COUNSEL — SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE — MOTION TO STAY — MOOTNESS: Defendant’s appeal was not moot because he moved in the trial court to stay his sentence pending appeal, demonstrating that the time he served following the denial of his motion for a stay was not served voluntarily. Defendant’s conviction for assault was supported by sufficient evidence where the victim identified the defendant as the assailant who caused him physical harm. Defendant did not establish ineffective assistance of counsel because he did not show a reasonable probability that counsel’s failure to file a motion to dismiss on speedy trial grounds affected the outcome of his trial, nor did he demonstrate that his attorney performed deficiently by failing to file such a motion where the record on appeal did not contain the record of a case filed and dismissed that was necessary to establish ineffective assistance.KinsleyHamilton 10/9/2026 10/9/2026 2026-Ohio-3975
State v. Books C-260116CRIMINAL DAMAGING — SUFFICIENCY — MANIFEST WEIGHT — RESTITUTION: Defendant’s conviction for criminal damaging was supported by sufficient evidence and not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence where the State presented video evidence of defendant repeatedly jumping on the victim’s truck. The trial court’s restitution award was supported by competent, credible evidence where the victim testified about the damage to his truck and introduced the repair estimate as evidence.NestorHamilton 10/7/2026 10/7/2026 2026-Ohio-3946
12345678910...>>