Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 43 rows. Rows per page: 
12345
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State ex rel. Stultz v. Columbus City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. 17AP-656Because the amount of back pay recoverable has not been established with certainty, Stultz is not entitled to the requested writ of mandamus.SchusterFranklin 2/19/2019 2/19/2019 2019-Ohio-599
State ex rel. Anderson v. Sheeran 18AP-613Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus is sua sponte dismissed for failure to comply with the mandatory requirements of R.C. 2969.25. Respondent’s motion to dismiss held moot, and relator ordered to pay costs.BrunnerFranklin 2/19/2019 2/19/2019 2019-Ohio-600
Dearth v. Columbus 17AP-346De novo review of summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee municipal corporation affirmed when record shows that municipal corporation’s employees exercised discretion for which R.C. 2744.03(A)(5) confers immunity.BrunnerFranklin 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2019-Ohio-556
State ex rel. Bates v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas 17AP-752Respondent's motion to dismiss relator's mandamus action granted.BrownFranklin 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2019-Ohio-557
State v. Robinson 17AP-853Appellant's conviction for murder was supported by sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence.BrownFranklin 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2019-Ohio-558
State v. Simmons 18AP-183Where there were some clues of intoxication but the totality of the circumstances did not suggest that the defendant was under the influence of alcohol or drugs, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding no probable cause to arrest the defendant for driving while under the influence of marijuana.BrunnerFranklin 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2019-Ohio-559
Smith v. Estate of Knight 18AP-534Trial court did not err when it granted motion to dismiss.BrownFranklin 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2019-Ohio-560
Nelnet, Inc. v. Rauch 18AP-555Trial court's statement regarding rights of current owners of property was not necessary to its holding in judgment granting motion to declare prior foreclosure judgment void. Therefore, statement constituted dictum or an advisory opinion and was not subject to appeal.DorrianFranklin 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2019-Ohio-561
State v. Hawkins 18AP-600The trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion for resentencing on the basis of merger. A complete reading of the sentence entry reveals the court merged counts one and two, and only sentence appellant on count one, not count two. Accordingly, appellant's assignment of error is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.DorrianFranklin 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2019-Ohio-562
State ex rel. Berry v. Bessey 18AP-718No objections were filed to the magistrate's decision recommending that the court dismiss relator's complaint for mandamus for lack of compliance with R.C. 2969.25(C). No error of law or other defect is evident on the face of the magistrate's decision. Accordingly, the court adopts the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the magistrate's decision and dismisses relator's request for a writ of mandamus.DorrianFranklin 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2019-Ohio-563
12345