Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 142 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Rippey CA2017-12-186Anders no error.Per CuriamButler 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2258
Bavis v. Deimling CA2017-05-024, CA2017-06-026Trial court did not err by finding that an easement had terminated where the undisputed evidence showed that the former private roadway was no longer in existence, there was a new paved roadway, and there were various homes, curbs, and a cul-de-sac where the former private road existed.RinglandClermont 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2259
In re D.M. CA2017-12-017, CA2017-12-018Juvenile court did not err in granting permanent custody to children services agency where decision was supported by clear and convincing evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence.RinglandPreble 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2260
State v. Laghaoui CA2017-06-098The trial court did not err by finding appellant competent to stand trial where appellant failed to meet his burden of proof establishing his incompetence by a preponderance of the evidence. The trial court also did not err by instructing the jury on intoxication where appellant's intoxication was raised as part of his not guilty by reason of insanity defense, nor did the trial court err by excluding testimony from appellant's intended expert witness where the proffered testimony was an unreliable, untested assumption that was inadmissible pursuant to Evid.R. 702.S. PowellWarren 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2261
Burns v. Burns CA2017-08-129The trial court did not err in dismissing Mother's motion to hold Father in contempt for claiming the parties' emancipated daughter as a dependent on his 2015 taxes, as the issue of which parent could claim the parties' daughter as a tax exemption after the daughter reached the age of majority was not agreed upon by the parties or set forth in the adopted shared parenting plan. Moreover, as the parties' daughter had reached the age of majority, the court no longer had jurisdiction to determine which parent should be permitted to claim her on their taxes.HendricksonWarren 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2262
State v. Comer CA2017-09-135Appellant's OVI convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where appellant admitted to taking a drug of abuse (Neurontin), he was observed weaving back and forth on the road, he had droopy eyelids and slurred his speech, and he refused to take a chemical test after being arrested.RinglandWarren 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2264
State v. Parr CA2018-01-005Anders no error.Per CuriamWarren 6/11/2018 6/11/2018 2018-Ohio-2265
In re D.A.S.H. CA2018-01-013Anders no error.Per CuriamWarren 6/4/2018 6/4/2018 2018-Ohio-2141
State v. Minton CA2017-08-132Appellant's conviction for OVI was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the state presented overwhelming evidence of his guilt.RinglandWarren 6/4/2018 6/4/2018 2018-Ohio-2142
In re S.B. CA2018-01-015The trial court properly granted permanent custody of appellant's child to the agency where the child had been in foster care for 29 consecutive months and it was in the child's best interest. The child did very well in foster care while appellant was unable to care for the child who has special needs.PiperButler 6/4/2018 6/4/2018 2018-Ohio-2143