|
|
State v. Wise
| 24CA17, 25CA4 | CRIMINAL-CRIM.R. 22-APP.R. 9(C) - Trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding that no manifest injustice occurred and therefore denying appellant's post-sentence motion to withdraw his plea, where basis for motion was appellant's allegation that trial counsel did not provide him discovery and was otherwise ineffective but appellant confirmed to trial court during plea colloquy that counsel did provide discovery, did discuss discovery with him, and appellant expressed no dissatisfaction with counsel; appellant's contention that trial counsel met with him only briefly at pretrials, did not communicate with hiim about his case, and did not discuss his discovery with him prior to morning that he entered plea are matters outside the record and more properly raised in postconviction proceedings. | Smith | Jackson |
8/17/2026
|
8/24/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3291 |
|
State v. Bost
| 25CA3 | CRIMINAL-ANIMAL CRUELTY-R.C. 959.131(B)-MANIFEST WEIGHT - Appellant's conviction for cruelty against a companion animal was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the evidence demonstrated that appellant struck the dog and caused it to yelp, and caused the dog to bleed from its nose for several hours; the determination that cruelty was established was further supported by evidence in the record demonstrating that the dog's subsequent behavior indicated it was fearful of appellant, resulting in the dog having to be rehomed. | Smith | Ross |
8/12/2026
|
8/19/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3213 |
|
Rogers v. Rogers
| 25CA11 | TERMINATION OF SHARED PARENTING DECREE - Under the plain language of R.C. 3109.04(E)(2)(c), a court may terminate a prior final shared parenting decree that includes a shared parenting plan upon the request of one or both of the parents or whenever it determines that shared parenting is not in the best interest of the children; competent credible evidence supported Magistrate's Decision and trial court's Decision and Entry which independently reviewed Magistrate's Decision that found that shared parenting should be terminated based on the best interest of the minor children; thus, court did not abuse its discretion in terminating shared parenting decree. | Smith | Pickaway |
8/11/2026
|
8/20/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3249 |
|
State v. Winn
| 25CA4118 | Violation of a protection order; first-degree misdemeanor; Victim's right to appeal; Victim's rights at sentencing - Marsy's Law; Ohio Const., art. I, §10(a)(A)(2); Ohio Const., art. I, §10(a)(A)(3); Ohio Const., art. I, §10(a)(D); R.C. 2930.06(A)(3); R.C. 2930.09(A)(1); R.C. 2930.09(A)(2)(a); R.C. 2930.09(A)(2)(b); R.C. 2930.14(A) | Wilkin | Scioto |
8/10/2026
|
8/20/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3218 |
|
State v. Prude
| 25CA4136 | Obstructing official business; failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer; guilty plea; maximum penalty notification – consecutive prison term notification; allied offenses; plain error; stipulation; CrimR. 11(C)(2); Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(a); R.C. 2921.331(B); R.C. 2921.331(D); R.C. 2929.13(B)(1)(b); R.C. 2929.13(c); R.C. 2941.25(B) | Wilkin | Scioto |
8/10/2026
|
8/20/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3219 |
|