Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 300 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
07/27/2017 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions-Disciplinary cases-Miscellaneous dismissals-Mediation matters.   7/27/2017 7/27/2017 2017-Ohio-6977
State v. D.B. (Slip Opinion) 2015-0192Once the general division of a court of common pleas determines under R.C. 2152.121(B)(4) that a 16-year-old or 17-year-old has been convicted of at least one offense that is subject to mandatory transfer, the court shall sentence the juvenile under R.C. Chapter 2929 for all the convictions in the case-Motion for reconsideration granted-Judgment reversed.Fischer, J.Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6952 7/27/2017 7/27/2017 2017-Ohio-6952
Gyugo v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Dev. Disabilities (Slip Opinion) 2016-0564Sealing of records-R.C. 2953.33(B)-Questions explicitly requiring disclosure of sealed convictions on Department of Developmental Disabilities applications to renew registration as adult-services worker did not violate R.C. 2953.33(B) because questions were directly and substantially related to appellant's position with appellee and his qualifications for adult-services registration-Court of appeals' judgment affirming appellant's termination for dishonestly answering the questions affirmed.French, J.Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6953 7/27/2017 7/27/2017 2017-Ohio-6953
Patrick v. Bunting (Slip Opinion) 2016-1375Habeas corpus-Writ of habeas corpus is not the proper means through which to challenge a complaint or indictment or to raise claims related to arrest-Petitioner had adequate remedy at law-Court of appeals' denial of writ affirmed.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6954 7/27/2017 7/27/2017 2017-Ohio-6954
Swain v. Harris (Slip Opinion) 2016-1465Habeas corpus-Trial court had jurisdiction to try appellant-Appellant had adequate remedy at law to challenge trial court's evidentiary ruling-Court of appeals' dismissal of petition affirmed.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6962 7/27/2017 7/27/2017 2017-Ohio-6962
Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Williamson (Slip Opinion) 2017-0226Attorneys-Misconduct-Written advertising--Improper solicitation of potential client-Public reprimand.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6963 7/27/2017 7/27/2017 2017-Ohio-6963
Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Heben (Slip Opinion) 2016-1495Attorneys-Misconduct-Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct-Conditionally stayed one-year suspension.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6965 7/27/2017 7/27/2017 2017-Ohio-6965
Dayton v. State (Slip Opinion) 2015-1549Home rule-Ohio Constitution, Article XVIII, Section 3-R.C. 4511.093(B)(1), 4511.0912, and 4511.095-Procedures for the use of traffic cameras-Provisions requiring the presence of a law-enforcement officer at each camera, that a ticket cannot be issued unless a vehicle exceeds the posted limit by a stated amount, and that municipalities must conduct a safety study and wage a public-information campaign are not general laws and are unconstitutional.Fischer, J.Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6909 7/26/2017 7/26/2017 2017-Ohio-6909
State ex rel. Peterson v. McClelland (Slip Opinion) 2016-0741Mandamus and prohibition-Mandamus claim barred by res judicata-Prohibition claim without merit because judge did not exceed his jurisdiction-Court of appeals' judgment denying writs of mandamus and prohibition affirmed.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6922 7/26/2017 7/26/2017 2017-Ohio-6922
State ex rel. Burroughs v. Ohio Hwy. Patrol Retirement Sys. Bd. (Slip Opinion) 2016-0921Mandamus-Writ sought to compel Ohio Highway Patrol Retirement System Board to vacate its termination of his disability-retirement benefits-Court of appeals' abused its discretion in granting limited writ ordering the board to conduct a physical-capacity evaluation-Board had no duty to conduct physical-capacity evaluation prior to terminating disability-retirement benefits-Court of appeals' judgment reversed and writ denied.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-6923 7/26/2017 7/26/2017 2017-Ohio-6923
12345678910...>>