Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 33 rows. Rows per page: 
1234
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
AM & JV, L.L.C. v. MyFlori, L.L.C. 16AP-713Trial court did not err by overruling objections to magistrate's decision denying appellants' motion for a new trial, or, in the alternative, motions for additur and remittitur.DorrianFranklin 2/15/2018 2/15/2018 2018-Ohio-600
State v. Fudge 16AP-821Any error in excluding evidence under Evid.R. 403 was harmless in light of overwhelming evidence of appellant's guilt.BrownFranklin 2/15/2018 2/15/2018 2018-Ohio-601
State v. Oliver 17AP-195Trial court did not err when it denied appellant's request for a continuance to hire private counsel.BrownFranklin 2/15/2018 2/15/2018 2018-Ohio-602
Woods v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. 17AP-630The trial court did not abuse its discretion in adopting the magistrate's decision where Woods did not support his objections to the magistrate's decision with a transcript or a properly filed affidavit of evidence under Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(iii).Luper SchusterFranklin 2/15/2018 2/15/2018 2018-Ohio-603
State v. D.H. 16AP-501Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, case remanded for resentencing. Jury instructions did not rise to the level of plain error. The evidence was insufficient to sustain appellant's conviction for rape by vaginal intercourse, as the state failed to prove that the conduct occurred prior to the August 3, 2006 amendment to R.C. 2907.01(A), and the evidence failed to demonstrate that appellant inserted his penis into the victim's vaginal opening. Appellant's rape conviction was modified to a conviction for gross sexual imposition in violation of R.C. 2907.05(A)(4). Appellant failed to demonstrate that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for a mistrial.BrownFranklin 2/13/2018 2/13/2018 2018-Ohio-559
State v. El-Amin 17AP-439, 17AP-440, 17AP-441Jail-time credit for multiple cases in which an offender was simultaneously jailed pretrial on two sentences was properly applied just once to a defendant's aggregate consecutive sentence in fulfilling constitutional requirements for equal protection under the law.BrunnerFranklin 2/13/2018 2/13/2018 2018-Ohio-560
Hasberry v. Mills 17AP-518Litigant who failed to object to magistrate's decision, failed to obtain a transcript, and filed a brief that did not in any way conform to requirements for form and content for a brief does not prevail in an appeal.BrunnerFranklin 2/13/2018 2/13/2018 2018-Ohio-561
State v. Jones 17AP-759Inmate who has already pursued a direct appeal of his sentence cannot prevail on a petition for postconviction relief on the same issues.TyackFranklin 2/13/2018 2/13/2018 2018-Ohio-562
State v. Fox 17AP-295Appellant's felonious assault convictions were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Additionally, the trial court did not err in not instructing the jury on the offense of negligent assault because the evidence at trial did not reasonably support both an acquittal for felonious assault and a conviction for negligent assault. Judgment affirmed.Luper SchusterFranklin 2/8/2018 2/8/2018 2018-Ohio-501
In re T.G. 17AP-411The trial court did not err in terminating mother's parental rights because mother failed to substantially complete her case plan and it was in the best interest of the child.KlattFranklin 2/8/2018 2/8/2018 2018-Ohio-502
1234