Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 93 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Hayes 2014-P-0044CRIMINAL LAW - PLEAS, MOTIONS & OTHER HEARINGS - rape; App.R. 5(A); delayed appeal; Crim.R. 11(C); the standard of review for whether a trial court accepted a plea in compliance with Crim.R. 11(C) is de novo; a trial court must strictly comply when advising a defendant of constitutional rights; the test for strict compliance is whether the record shows the trial court explained a defendant's constitutional rights in a manner reasonably intelligible to the defendant. O'ToolePortage 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2794
State v. Aikens 2014-T-0124CRIMINAL LAW - rape; gross sexual imposition; child; manifest weight of the evidence; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); trial court must make findings before imposing consecutive sentences on multiple offenses; plain error; sentencing court is not required to give reasons for a consecutive sentence; trial court's failure to incorporate findings required by R.C. 2929.14 in the sentencing entry after making those findings at sentencing hearing does not render sentence contrary to law; such clerical mistake can be corrected via nunc pro tunc entry; trial court's failure to make the findings at the sentencing hearing makes the sentence contrary to law, requiring vacation of sentence and remand for resentencing; because trial court failed to make findings of fact before imposing consecutive sentences on multiple offenses, sentence is contrary to law and constitutes plain error.WrightTrumbull 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2795
Janson v. John Beninato Zoning Inspector 2015-A-0039 & 2015-A-0040REAL PROPERTY - Non-conforming use; voluntarily discontinued; two years; burden of proof; legal title to property held in trust; intent of trustees to discontinue use; majority vote.WrightAshtabula 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2796
In re D.B.M. 2015-G-0018JUVENILE - juvenile sex offender; Tier II; timing; classification; after release from a secure facility; R.C. 2152.83(A)(1); double jeopardy; no legitimate expectation of finality.RiceGeauga 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2797
State v. Olp 2015-G-0037DRUNK DRIVING - the OVI repeat offender specification set forth at R.C. 2941.1413 does not violate equal protection.O'TooleGeauga 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2798
State v. Sutton 2015-L-095CRIMINAL LAW - Felony Sentencing; R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); imposition of prison term within statutory range; consideration of statutory range; contray to law; consecuutive sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4); clear and convincing evidence that trial court's findings were incorrect; protection of public; disproportionate to danger posed.WrightLake 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2799
State v. Dawson 2015-L-109CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING/FINES, RESTITUTION, EXPUNGEMENT - appellate courts must apply standard of review in R.C. 2953.08(G)(2) when reviewing felony sentences; reviewing court presumes trial court considered all appropriate sentencing factors even if record is silent; court is not required to state on record it considered statutory sentencing factors; trial court satisfies its obligation to consider statutory principles and factors by stating it considered them; trial court is not required to give any particular weight or emphasis to a given set of circumstances; it is merely required to consider the factors in exercising its discretionRiceLake 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2800
Shalersville Twp. Bd. of Trustees v. Hawkins 2015-P-0071ZONING - Township zoning; R.C. 519.21(A); agriculture exception; use of building for agriculture; primary or ancillary use; residential use of mobile home.WrightPortage 5/2/2016 5/2/2016 2016-Ohio-2801
Meeker R&D, Inc. v. Evenflo Co., Inc 2014-P-0060 & 2015-P-0017CONTRACTS - bench trial; breach of contract and royalty claims; state court jurisdiction proper over claims arising from federal patents; subsequent version of child's play center still "covered by" patent and during the patent period; parties bound to plain language of contract.WrightPortage 4/25/2016 4/25/2016 2016-Ohio-2688
State v. Starr 2015-L-113CRIMINAL - sentencing; consecutive sentences; findings.CannonTrumbull 4/25/2016 4/25/2016 2016-Ohio-2689