|
|
State v. Collins
| CA2025-12-103 | Trial counsel's failure to bring to trial the recording of the police officer's body camera footage of his interaction with appellant and which he intended to use for impeachment did not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel. Trial court's imposition of the fine did not constitute plain error where the trial court had before it some evidence of appellant's ability to pay the fine. | M. Powell | Clermont |
10/13/2026
|
10/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4005 |
|
State v. Baker
| CA2026-03-028 | Appellant's guilty plea was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily where the trial court was not required to advise appellant of the consequences of committing a future felony while on postrelease control because appellant was not on postrelease control at the time of the plea. In addition, the trial court discussed the mandatory fine during the plea colloquy, appellant understood that defense counsel intended to seek a waiver of that fine, the fine was ultimately waived, no driver's license suspension was imposed, and appellant failed to establish prejudice from any alleged omission. In addition, the trial court properly concluded that appellant's offense carried a mandatory 11-year prison term. Although the major-drug-offender specification attached to another count was dismissed as part of the plea agreement, appellant pled guilty to trafficking in heroin in an amount that subjected him to the mandatory sentencing provisions of R.C. 2925.03(C)(6)(g), and the resulting sentence was not contrary to law. | Siebert | Butler |
10/13/2026
|
10/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4003 |
|
State v. Massey
| CA2026-03-035 | The trial court did not err in denying appellant's request for a self-defense jury instruction where the record established that appellant failed to satisfy the burden of production on the second element of nondeadly self-defense, and thereby was not entitled to such jury instruction. | Piper | Butler |
10/13/2026
|
10/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4004 |
|
State v. Williams
| CA2026-02-028 | Anders no error. | Per Curiam | Warren |
10/5/2026
|
10/5/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3913 |
|
State v. Hubbs
| CA2025-12-097 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's presentence motion to withdraw her guilty plea. The trial court also did not err when it did not issue specific findings pursuant to Crim.R. 12(F) on appellant's motion to dismiss where she improperly asked the court to resolve issues that could only be decided at trial. Appellant's defense counsel was further not ineffective for not filing a motion to change venue and for not requesting findings of fact where appellant could not demonstrate prejudice. | Piper | Clermont |
10/5/2026
|
10/5/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3910 |
|