|
|
In re Estate of Murphy
| 30786 | The probate court did not abuse its discretion when it removed the appellant as the fiduciary, because the will had not specifically appointed a fiduciary, and the probate court scheduled a hearing on the issue. Judgment affirmed. (Tucker, J., dissenting.) | Epley | Montgomery |
8/14/2026
|
8/14/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3141 |
|
Dick Lavy Trucking, Inc. v. ScriptSourcing, L.L.C.
| 2025-CA-24 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied appellant’s motion for relief from default judgment, because appellant had not established excusable neglect in failing to respond to appellee’s declaratory judgment action. The trial court did not err in rendering its decision without a hearing on appellee’s default judgment motion, because appellant had failed to enter an appearance in the case, and thus no hearing was required under Civ.R. 55(A). Judgment affirmed. (Tucker, J., concurring.) | Epley | Darke |
8/14/2026
|
8/14/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3139 |
|
State v. Gibson
| 2026-CA-4 | The record does not support appellant’s assertions that she is a victim entitled to the constitutional and statutory protections under Marsy’s Law. Therefore, appellant lacked standing to appeal from the trial court’s judgment imposing a sentence on defendant-appellee. Appeal dismissed. | Lewis | Clark |
8/14/2026
|
8/14/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3140 |
|
State v. Crossley
| 2025-CA-76 | The juvenile court did not abuse its discretion by finding that appellant was not amenable to rehabilitation within the juvenile justice system and transferring appellant’s case for prosecution as an adult. Judgment affirmed. | Hanseman | Clark |
8/14/2026
|
8/14/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3136 |
|
State v. Jackson
| 2025-CA-57 | Appellant’s conviction for trespass in a habitation when a person is present or likely to be present was based on sufficient evidence and was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed. | Epley | Greene |
8/14/2026
|
8/14/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3138 |
|