Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 186 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re K.G. S-25-027Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, affirms the judgment because the State presented sufficient evidence to sustain the conviction for illegal conveyance of drugs in violation of R.C. 2821.36(A)(2) based on evidence demonstrating offender’s knowledge that drugs were concealed within their clothing during the intake process and the officer’s testimony, based on training and experience, that the substance discovered in the offender’s clothing was raw marijuana.ZmudaSandusky 8/11/2026 8/11/2026 2026-Ohio-3079
State v. Daniels E-25-023Trial court did not err in denying motion to suppress evidence seized in a search incident to arrest where officers had probable cause to believe defendant committed a crime and the warrantless arrest occurred in a public place. Matter remanded to the trial court to determine whether evidence seized from the defendant’s residence was discovered pursuant to a valid search warrant supported by probable cause independent of any information gained from an initial warrantless entry.SulekErie 8/7/2026 8/7/2026 2026-Ohio-3050
DiCresce v. Dicresce L-26-00023Trial Court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for relief from judgment without an evidentiary hearing. Motion seeking relief from judgment based on fraudulent representations was not filed within one year of the judgment as required by Civ.R. 60(B)(3). Trial court was not required to conduct a hearing to determine the timeliness of appellant’s motion.ZmudaLucas 8/7/2026 8/7/2026 2026-Ohio-3051
Oswald v. Oswald L-25-00099Duhart. Trustee. Appointment of successor trustee.DuhartLucas 8/7/2026 8/7/2026 2026-Ohio-3053
State v. Laughlin E-26-001Testimony of the deputy is sufficient to support defendant’s conviction for speeding.OsowikErie 8/7/2026 8/7/2026 2026-Ohio-3052
12345678910...>>