Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:

-Ohio-

Citation:

WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.

Hide Topics and Issues column This search returned 240 rows. Rows per page:

State v. Martin

H-26-007

Per Mayle, J., trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant’s pre-sentence motion to withdraw his plea. The record supports a finding that appellant had the ability to pay fines imposed by trial court. Trial court erred by imposing a fine not authorized by R.C. 4511.19 and omitting the fine under R.C. 2929.18 from its judgment entry. Postrelease control does not violate the separation of powers doctrine.

Mayle

Huron

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3778

Hamilton v. Bridgeport Equip. & Tool, Ltd.

L-26-00008

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, finds that the trial court erred when it failed to transfer the matter to the county with appropriate subject matter jurisdiction over and appeal from the Ohio Industrial Commission’s denial of appellant’s death benefits claim.

Zmuda

Lucas

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3775

State v. Johnson

L-25-00245

The trial court did not err in dismissing mandamus and prohibition action filed against trial judge and prosecutors in appellant’s criminal case.

Sulek

Lucas

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3776

Orwig v. Kit Mgt. of NOW, L.L.C.

L-26-00009

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority affirms the judgment dismissing the application for rent escrow and releasing funds to the appellant after granting the tenant’s motion for reduction, in part, finding R.C. 5321.09 permits a landlord to request release of funds held in escrow, but does not require a motion after termination of the proceedings.

Zmuda

Lucas

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3777

State v. Woodley

L-25-00175

Per Osowik, J., appellant never made a timely or unequivocal assertion that he wanted to invoke his right to self-representation. Therefore, the trial court did not deny appellant his right to self-representation and appellant’s sole assignment of error is found not well-taken.

Osowik

Lucas

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3779

...