Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:

-Ohio-

Citation:

WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.

Hide Topics and Issues column This search returned 218 rows. Rows per page:

State v. Barnes

L-25-00240

Duhart. Juvenile court did not abuse its discretion in transferring appellant’s case to trial court.

Duhart

Lucas

9/11/2026

2026-Ohio-3558

State v. Turner

L-25-00250, L-25-00251

Judge Duhart. Appellant’s guilty plea was made knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily. The trial court did not err by accepting appellant’s guilty plea without a presentation of facts by the State as such a presentation is not required for a guilty plea under Crim.R. 11 and his plea did not amount to an Alford plea.

Duhart

Lucas

9/11/2026

2026-Ohio-3560

State v. Smith

L-25-00180

Duhart. No error in imposition of consecutive sentences; no need to merge involuntary manslaughter with improper discharge offense for purposes of sentencing; no ineffective assistance; matter remanded for imposition of indefinite prison terms for Counts 10 and 11 and for proper post-release control notification in sentencing JE.

Duhart

Lucas

9/11/2026

2026-Ohio-3559

State v. Fletcher

OT-25-037, OT-25-038

No trial court error in convicting appellant for community control violations and sentencing him to an aggregate 45-month prison term. Judgment affirmed. Osowik.

Osowik

Ottawa

9/11/2026

2026-Ohio-3556

State v. Rutherford

L-26-00047, L-26-00048

Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, finds that the trial court’s judgment entry contained a clerical error that did not reflect the sentence imposed at hearing. Judgment is reversed and remanded for the entry of a nunc pro tunc order reflecting the sentence imposed.

Zmuda

Lucas

9/11/2026

2026-Ohio-3557

...