|
|
Isaacs v. Paul
| 26 MA 0012 | divorce; assets; financial misconduct; appraisals; burden; marital property; objections to the magistrate’s decision; transcript of proceedings; abuse of discretion. | Robb | Mahoning |
10/28/2026
|
10/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4274 |
|
Dukes v. Mahoning Cty. Sheriff
| 26 MA 0086 | habeas corpus; Civ.R. 12(B)(6) motion to dismiss; pretrial detainee; R.C. 2725.04(D) commitment papers not exhibited; defective petition; no allegation that commitment papers could not be procured; detention without legal authority not made to appear; adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law; no request for relief from bail; no patent and unambiguous lack of jurisdiction; detention before indictment; R.C. 2937.34 examining court; judicial notice of trial-court docket entries; exhibits construed as motions overruled as moot; costs | Per Curiam | Mahoning |
10/27/2026
|
10/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4271 |
|
Vantell v. Hume
| 26 MA 0011 | Where buyer of real property made aware of defect through home inspection not disclosed by seller and buyer proceeds to purchase property in “as is” condition, buyer on notice of defect; no later claim for fraudulent concealment lies; later filed “self-serving” affidavit that attempts to create an issue of material fact contradicting own inspection report not appropriate in summary judgment. | Waite | Mahoning |
10/27/2026
|
10/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4272 |
|
Marty v. ODMA Resources, L.L.C.
| 26 MO 0001 | Royalty reservation in 1921 deed; reservation contains a broad lead sentence of all the one-half part of all the royalty in oil and gas; the reservation is a floating one-half royalty; the second sentence of the reservation does not nullify the first; oil and gas lease stated that royalties were non-refundable; oil company did not ask for or take a refund by accounting for prior royalty overpayments through deductions from future royalty payments; oil company’s delay in putting disputed royalties into an escrow account did not constitute an actionable breach of contract because plaintiff could not show any damages; judgment affirmed, but case is remanded so that a counterclaim can be resolved. | Waite | Mahoning |
10/27/2026
|
10/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4273 |
|
Wittkugle v. Davis
| 26 MA 0074 | forcible entry and detainer action; trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction; R.C. 1923.04; three-day notice not required to contain rent due amount | Hanni | Mahoning |
10/23/2026
|
10/23/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4199 |
|