SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENTS

6/8/20 | In re Notary Requirements for Domestic-Relations, Juvenile, General, and Probate Forms
The domestic-relations, juvenile, general, and probate forms available on the court’s website may be used by courts and parties in lieu of the similar versions of the forms requiring notarization in the Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, the Ohio Rules of Juvenile Procedure, and the Rules of Superintendence for the Courts of Ohio. View the Supreme Court Order | View the Revised Forms

6/3/20 | In re Remote Administration of Oaths and Affirmations
Any oath or an affirmation required by a rule of the Court may be administered remotely by use of audio- or video-communication technology, provided the technology shall allow the person administering the oath or affirmation to positively identify the person taking the oath or making the affirmation. View the Supreme Court Order

Supreme Court Frequently Called Numbers

Attorney Services:
614.387.9320

Clerk:
614.387.9530

Disciplinary Counsel:
614.387.9700

Court Services:
614.387.9400

Visit the Court's Office Directory for additional contact numbers.

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

The Supreme Court of Ohio
& The Ohio Judicial System

Moyer Judicial Center
Media Information
Ohio Laws
Law Library
Boards & Commissions
Committees & Task Forces
Reports & Publications
Career Opportunities
CORONAVIRUS (COVID-19)

CORONAVIRUS RESOURCES

With the outbreak of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) across the United States and now into Ohio, the Ohio Department of Health (ODH) is asking employers and agencies open to the public to help prevent further spread of the disease.


LAW LIBRARY CLOSED TO PUBLIC

The Library is still offering reference assistance via Ask-A-Librarian, or you can email the reference staff directly at libref@sc.ohio.gov.

Image of the Ohio Department of Health logo

Questions about COVID-19? Visit coronavirus.ohio.gov or call 1.833.4ASKODH (1.833.427.5634) for answers.

 

July 1, 2020

State v. Taylor
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3514
Summary

McIntyre v. Hooks
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3529

State ex rel. Neguse v. McIntosh
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3533

July 1, 2020

State ex rel. O’Diam v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3503
Summary

State ex rel. Martin v. Tuscarawas Cty. Job & Family Servs.
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3507

June 30, 2020

Pivonka v. Corcoran
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3476
Summary

State v. Willingham
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3475

June 25, 2020

State ex rel. Xenia v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs.
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3423
Summary

State ex rel. Frank v. Ohio State Univ.
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3422

June 24, 2020

State ex rel. Magsig v. Toledo
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3416
Summary

June 18, 2020

State v. McFarland
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3343
Summary

Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3345
Summary

Disciplinary Counsel v. Connors
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3339
Summary

In re Application of Phares
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3346

June 17, 2020

State v. Pendergrass
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3335
Summary

Lorain Cty. Bar Assn. v. Weir
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3324
Summary

Butler Cty. Bar Assn. v. Blauvelt
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3325

June 16, 2020

Bey v. Rasawehr
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3301
Summary

Disciplinary Counsel v. Corley
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3303
Summary

State ex rel. King v. Fleegle
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3302

June 11, 2020

Disciplinary Counsel v. Smidt
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3258
Summary

State ex rel. Thomas v. Gaul
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3257

Disciplinary Counsel v. Gonzalez
Slip Opinion No. 2020-Ohio-3259
Summary

Get e-mail updates when this information changes. Click to subscribe to the Supreme Court of Ohio Daily Case Announcement RSS Feed

July 10, 2020

In State ex rel. Omni Energy Group, L.L.C. v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Div. of Oil & Gas Resources, the Court granted an alternative writ and set the briefing schedule.

View Complete Second Announcement »

The Court dismissed State ex rel. Mobley v. O’Donnell at relator Alphonso-Dwayne Mobley’s request.

View Complete Announcement »

July 9, 2020

In State ex rel. Omni Energy Group, L.L.C. v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, Div. of Oil & Gas Resources, the Court granted an alternative writ and set the briefing schedule.

View Complete Second Announcement »

The Court dismissed State ex rel. Trumbull Cty. Children Servs. v. Fredericka

View Complete Second Announcement »

In Disciplinary Counsel v. Wiggins, the Court found Brian M. Wiggins in contempt for his failure to demonstrate compliance with his May 4 immediate remedial suspension.

View Complete Announcement »

July 8, 2020

In State v. Jones, the Court granted appellee Earl Jones’ request to appoint the Ohio Public Defender’s Office as his counsel.

View Complete Announcement »

July 7, 2020

The Court accepted State ex rel. Ohio History Connection v. Moundbuilders Country Club Co. for review.

View Complete Second Announcement »

The Court dismissed State ex rel. Salvador Properties, L.L.C. v. Russell after the parties reached a settlement.

View Complete Announcement »

July 6, 2020

The Court dismissed State ex rel. Prass v. Ring at the request of relator Arliss Prass after the parties reached a settlement.

View Complete Announcement »

July 2, 2020

In State v.Taylor, the Court ruled a trial court does not have to consider a convicted criminal defendant’s present or future ability to pay court costs when considering the defendant’s request to have the cost eliminated or modified.

View Complete Announcement »

July 1, 2020

In Johnson v. Johnson, the Court granted appellant Stephen E. Johnson’s request to file an amended appeal.

View Complete Third Announcement »

The Court dismissed LG Chem, Ltd. v. Hagan.

View Complete Second Announcement »

In State ex rel. O’Diam v. Greene Cty. Bd. of Commrs., the Court ruled Greene County does not have to pay the more than $66,000 in attorney fees and expenses incurred by the county probate court judge during a legal dispute about courtroom use because the judge did not follow the process in state law for securing payment.

View Complete Announcement »