Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 587 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
10/19/2026 Administrative Actions #2  Administrative actions.   10/19/2026 10/19/2026 2026-Ohio-4075
State ex rel. Florio v. Sandusky Cty. Bd. of Elections 2026-1253Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to require board of elections to count, tally, or record only the votes cast for one candidate in November 2026 general election for office of common-pleas-court judge—Relator’s claim is an ill-disguised claim for a prohibitory injunction—A relator does not invoke this court’s mandamus jurisdiction if the allegations establish that the relator instead seeks relief in nature of a declaratory judgment and a prohibitory injunction—State ex rel. Williamson v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections distinguished—Cause dismissed for want of jurisdiction.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-4090 10/19/2026 10/19/2026 2026-Ohio-4090
10/19/2026 Administrative Actions  Administrative actions.   10/19/2026 10/19/2026 2026-Ohio-4089
State ex rel. Sommers Dev. Group, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections 2026-1307Elections—Prohibition—Mandamus—Writs sought to remove an initiative ordinance from November 2026 general-election ballot—Relator’s claim not barred by doctrine of laches, because it did not unreasonably delay in asserting a right—Relator failed to show that board of elections abused its discretion or clearly disregarded applicable law in placing initiative ordinance on ballot and denying relator’s protest—Writs denied.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-4092 10/19/2026 10/19/2026 2026-Ohio-4092
10/19/2026 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions.   10/19/2026 10/19/2026 2026-Ohio-4093
12345678910...>>