|
|
05/29/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/29/2026
|
5/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1989 |
|
05/29/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/29/2026
|
5/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1993 |
|
In re Resignation of Buzzelli
| 2026-0471 | Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). | | |
5/29/2026
|
5/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1987 |
|
State v. Fraley
| 2024-1038 | Criminal law—Postconviction relief—R.C. 2953.21—Under R.C. 2953.21(A)(2)(a), a petition for postconviction relief under R.C. 2953.21(A)(1)(a)(i) must be filed no later than 365 days after date on which transcript of trial-court proceedings is filed in a defendant’s direct appeal, or if no appeal is taken, no later than 365 days after expiration of the time for filing the appeal—Trial court dismissed appellant’s postconviction petition as untimely when appellant filed petition within 365 days after date on which he filed transcript of trial-court proceedings in support of his App.R. 26(B) application to reopen his appeal—A reopened appeal under App.R. 26(B) is not a direct appeal, so filing a transcript of trial-court proceedings in support of an App.R. 26(B) application to reopen does not determine the deadline for filing a postconviction petition—Court of appeals’ judgment affirming trial court’s judgment dismissing appellant’s postconviction petition affirmed. | Deters, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1964 |
5/29/2026
|
5/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1964 |
|
Olentangy Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Revision
| 2024-0814 and 2024-0815 | Taxation—Valuation of real property for tax purposes—R.C. 2506.01(C) excludes a board of revision’s property-valuation decisions from the class of decisions appealable to a common pleas court under R.C. 2506.01(A) since property-valuation decisions are appealable to a higher administrative authority, Board of Tax Appeals, under R.C. 5717.01—Property-valuation decisions are appealable to a court of common pleas under R.C. 5717.05 only when the appellant owns the property at issue—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. | Hawkins, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1963 |
5/29/2026
|
5/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1963 |
|
State v. Bissell
| 2024-1770 | Criminal law—Sufficiency of the evidence—Felonious assault—Felony murder—Failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer—Convictions for felony murder and failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer were supported by sufficient evidence—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded. | Fischer, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1965 |
5/29/2026
|
5/29/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1965 |
|
State ex rel. Javitch Block, L.L.C. v. Wollsheid
| 2025-0663 | Prohibition—Mandamus—Procedendo—Jurisdictional-priority rule—Once a court properly reinstates a case, the court generally has jurisdiction to proceed in the case—Municipal-court judge did not patently and unambiguously lack jurisdiction to order clerk of courts to docket answer and counterclaims or to reinstate debt-collection action filed by relators before certifying it to court of common pleas—Jurisdictional-priority rule does not apply to impede municipal court’s jurisdiction—Writs denied. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1923 |
5/28/2026
|
5/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1923 |
|
05/28/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/28/2026
|
5/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1956 |
|
05/28/2026 Case Announcements #3
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/28/2026
|
5/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1988 |
|
05/28/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/28/2026
|
5/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1955 |
|
State ex rel. Haydocy v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Retirement Sys.
| 2025-0850 | Mandamus—Former state employee failed to demonstrate either that he has a clear legal right to a writ compelling Ohio Public Employees Retirement System (“OPERS”) to process his request to transfer his OPERS-held funds to his deferred-compensation plan in absence of notarized consent form or that OPERS has a clear legal duty to provide that relief—Adm.Code 145-2-67(A) permits Public Employees Retirement Board to prescribe time and manner of rollover distributions—State ex rel. Davis v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd. (10th Dist.) distinguished—Court of appeals’ judgment granting OPERS’s motion to dismiss affirmed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1928 |
5/28/2026
|
5/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1928 |
|
05/28/2026 Administrative Actions
| | Administrative actions. | | |
5/28/2026
|
5/28/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1957 |
|
05/27/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals—Mediation matters. | | |
5/27/2026
|
5/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1932 |
|
Posan v. Boyer
| 2025-0491 | Cause remanded to court of appeals for application of Hoskins v. Cleveland. | | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1898 |
5/27/2026
|
5/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1898 |
|
State ex rel. Ctr. for Media & Democracy v. Yost
| 2023-0270 | Mandamus—Public-records requests—Discovery—In public-records mandamus action, court of appeals issued discovery order compelling responses to interrogatories and requests for production of documents and ordering attorney general to appear for deposition—Discovery in a public-records mandamus action must be restricted to conform with the purpose of discovery set forth in Civ.R. 26(A) and the scope of discovery set forth in Civ.R. 26(B)(1)—When requested records cannot be or have not been produced, courts should limit discovery in a public-records mandamus action to the nature of the public office’s search for responsive records and to information relevant to the claims and defenses asserted by the parties—When requested records exist and can be produced but the parties dispute whether the records should be produced, any discovery must be confined by the claims asserted by the requester and the defenses asserted by the public office relative to producing the records—In issuing its discovery order, the court of appeals misapplied the law and abused its discretion in determining the correct scope of discovery under Civ.R. 26(B)(1) in context of a public-records mandamus action and in ordering deposition of a high-ranking government official—Court of appeals’ discovery order vacated and cause remanded for proper consideration of discovery requests. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1899 |
5/27/2026
|
5/27/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1899 |
|
05/26/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1880 |
|
In re Application of Oak Run Solar Project, L.L.C.
| 2024-1477 | Public utilities—Certificate of construction for solar farm—R.C. 4906.10(A)—Adm.Code 4906-4-08(D)(4)(e)—Ohio Power Siting Board did not obtain from applicant seeking certificate to construct solar farm photographic simulations or artist’s pictorial sketches of substations for the proposed project, which the board needed to adequately assess the proposed project from public vantage points under Adm.Code 4906-4-08(D)(4)(e) and to make the substantive statutory determinations regarding the visual impacts of the proposed project under R.C. 4906.10(A)—Orders affirmed in part and reversed in part and matter remanded. | Fischer, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1849 |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1849 |
|
State ex rel. Yost v. Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn.
| 2024-1250 | Mandamus—Standing—Parens patriae doctrine—Parens patriae standing allows for the State to sue for indirect injury, which is inconsistent with the requirement that relators in mandamus cases be directly benefited or injured by a judgment in the case—Attorney general would not directly benefit from a writ of mandamus in a case affecting a small number of pupils within one school district and therefore cannot show that the case concerns well-being of a substantial segment of the State’s population—Parens patriae standing cannot apply in a mandamus case and attorney general lacks standing—Cause dismissed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1878 |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1878 |
|
In re Resignation of Yerman
| 2026-0541 | Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1883 |
|
In re Resignation of Henniger
| 2026-0573 | Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1884 |
|
05/26/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Official versions released—Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1897 |
|
05/26/2026 Case Announcements #3
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/26/2026
|
5/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1912 |
|
05/22/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/22/2026
|
5/22/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1879 |
|
05/22/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/22/2026
|
5/22/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1877 |
|
05/21/2026 Case Announcements
| | Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/21/2026
|
5/21/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1848 |
|
05/20/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/20/2026
|
5/20/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1819 |
|
05/19/2026 Case Announcements
| | Mediation matters. | | |
5/19/2026
|
5/19/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1817 |
|
05/18/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
5/18/2026
|
5/18/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1804 |
|
05/15/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/15/2026
|
5/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1786 |
|
05/15/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals not accepted for review. | | |
5/15/2026
|
5/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1801 |
|
05/14/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/14/2026
|
5/14/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1759 |
|
05/13/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/13/2026
|
5/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1760 |
|
05/13/2026 Case Announcements
| | Disciplinary cases—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/13/2026
|
5/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1740 |
|
05/12/2026 Case Announcements #3
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals—Mediation matters. | | |
5/12/2026
|
5/12/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1724 |
|
05/12/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/12/2026
|
5/12/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1687 |
|
05/12/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions. | | |
5/12/2026
|
5/12/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1686 |
|
05/11/2026 Case Announcements
| | Official versions released. | | |
5/11/2026
|
5/11/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1690 |
|
05/08/2026 Administrative Actions
| | Administrative actions. | | |
5/8/2026
|
5/8/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1670 |
|
05/08/2026 Case Announcements
| | Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/8/2026
|
5/8/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1671 |
|
05/06/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/6/2026
|
5/6/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1637 |
|
05/05/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/5/2026
|
5/5/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1621 |
|
State ex rel. Hill v. LaRose
| 2026-0531 | Elections—Mandamus, declaratory judgment, and injunction—Writ sought to compel secretary of state to accept replacement candidate for lieutenant governor—R.C. 3513.311(C) does not permit replacement of candidate for lieutenant governor within 70 days of primary election unless former candidate died—Court lacks original jurisdiction over claims seeking declaratory judgment or prohibitory injunction—Complaint dismissed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1601 |
5/4/2026
|
5/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1601 |
|
05/04/2026 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/4/2026
|
5/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1596 |
|
05/04/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Merit decisions with opinions. | | |
5/4/2026
|
5/4/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1613 |
|
05/03/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions. | | |
5/3/2026
|
5/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1600 |
|
State ex rel. Leneghan v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Elections
| 2026-0468 | Mandamus—Writ sought to compel board of elections to declare that relator is a resident of Delaware County for election purposes, maintain relator’s name on poll books as a properly registered voter, maintain relator’s name as a candidate on the May 5, 2026 primary-election ballot, and retract and rescind any referrals to county prosecutor and secretary of state for investigation of voter fraud—Relator’s request for order compelling board to retract or rescind any referrals for investigation of voter fraud dismissed because it is a request for injunctive relief rather than a proper request for mandamus relief—Writ denied as to relator’s remaining mandamus claims because board did not abuse its discretion or act in clear disregard of applicable law—Writ dismissed in part and denied in part. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1598 |
5/3/2026
|
5/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1598 |
|
State ex rel. Shannon v. Ogg
| 2026-0433 | Elections—Mandamus—Writ sought to compel clerk of city council to determine that petitions for recall election do not meet city charter’s signature requirements and to certify the particulars in which the petitions are defective to the person who filed them—City-charter provision requires that a recall petition must include a number of signatures equal to at least 15 percent of electors who voted at last regular municipal election at which mayor’s office was on ballot, not simply 15 percent of the electors who cast a vote for mayor—Writ granted. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1599 |
5/3/2026
|
5/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1599 |
|
05/01/2026 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
5/1/2026
|
5/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1597 |
|
05/01/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
5/1/2026
|
5/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1577 |
|
In re P.M.S.
| 2023-1531 | Criminal law—Juvenile delinquency—Sufficiency of the evidence—Rape—R.C. 2907.02(A)(2)—A rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that juvenile offender used force, as defined by R.C. 2901.01(A)(1), to compel victim to submit to sexual conduct—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. | Brunner, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-1543 |
5/1/2026
|
5/1/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1543 |
|