|
|
Operation Restoration, L.L.C. v. Wang
| 25AP-879 | Appellant appealed from a Franklin County Court of Common Pleas judgment denying their motion for leave to file an amended answer and counterclaim and granting appellee's motions for default judgment and summary judgment in their foreclosure action on a mechanic's lien. Accordingly, the court dismissed the appeal, concluding that the judgment was not a final, appealable order under R.C. 2505.02(B) because its contingent language necessarily left the issue of foreclosure unresolved. | Jamison | Franklin |
9/17/2026
|
9/17/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3644 |
|
Reese v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
| 26AP-24 & 26AP-27 | Judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio is affirmed. Court of Claims did not abuse its discretion in not granting an extension of time, or the use of alternative methods, for appellant to prepare a transcript. | Boggs | Franklin |
9/17/2026
|
9/17/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3647 |
|
Weilbacher v. Weilbacher
| 25AP-1007 | Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is reversed and the parties 2019 agreed shared parenting plan is reinstated. The trial court’s decision was against the manifest weight of the evidence and the magistrate’s decision was not supported by substantial, competent, and credible evidence. | Boggs | Franklin |
9/17/2026
|
9/17/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3646 |
|
State ex rel. Clark v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas
| 25AP-985 | Petition for writs of prohibition, mandamus, and procedendo is dismissed. | Per Curiam | Franklin |
9/17/2026
|
9/17/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3645 |
|
State v. Houser
| 24AP-651 | Appellant timely filed an application to reopen his direct appeal pursuant to App.R. 26(b) alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Appellant argues that appellate counsel was deficient in failing to communicate with appellant, failing to appear at mandatory oral argument, abandoning his client at a critical state of the appeal, oral argument; failing to raise conflict of interest of the trial judge; and failing to raise an assignment of error for sufficiency of the evidence and manifest weight of the evidence. Appellant failed to show how counsel abandoned him as a client when he filed a brief. Appellant is incarcerated but he provided no affidavit or copies of certified mail receipts to prove that he attempted to contact counsel or how he was prejudiced when counsel fulfilled his obligation to file a brief challenging ineffective assistance of the trial counsel, which appellant also raises in this application to reopen. Appellate counsel failed to raise sufficiency of the evidence and manifest weight of the evidence. Sufficiency does not challenge credibility but assumes the testimony to be correct. Manifest weight challenges credibility but allows the finder of fact to observe the demeanor of the witness and resolve credibility issues. The jury found the testimony of the three victims to be credible and sufficient evidence when viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution to find appellant guilty. The jury did not lose its way or create a manifest injustice. Each assignment of error is overruled. Application to reopen denied. | Jamison | Franklin |
9/15/2026
|
9/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3599 |
|