Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 289 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Smith v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. 17AP-245Judgment affirmed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it granted appellee’s motion to stay pending arbitration and referred appellant’s claims to arbitration. The arbitration clause in the parties’ contract is not unconscionable and appellant’s claims of fraud and material breach of the agreement do not defeat appellee’s right to have the arbitration clause enforced.HortonFranklin 9/18/2018 9/18/2018 2018-Ohio-3758
State v. Dixon 17AP-884Judgment affirmed. The trial court made all of the necessary findings at the sentencing hearing to impose consecutive sentences and consecutive sentences were not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. The defendant also failed to show that he was prejudiced and denied a fair and just hearing after the trial court ordered his removal from the sentencing hearing for being an obstreperous defendant.KlattFranklin 9/18/2018 9/18/2018 2018-Ohio-3759
State ex rel. Evans v. Mohr 18AP-71The relator's action in mandamus and/or prohibition is dismissed because a declaratory judgment action provides an adequate remedy at law to correct prison records.KlattFranklin 9/18/2018 9/18/2018 2018-Ohio-3760
State ex rel. Swanson v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. 18AP-136Writ of mandamus dismissed because relator did not list all civil actions he had filed in the past five years in the affidavit filed pursuant to R.C. 2969.25(A).KlattFranklin 9/18/2018 9/18/2018 2018-Ohio-3761
State v. Hillman 18AP-198The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion that the court make a determination that defendant was wrongfully arrested and incarcerated.KlattFranklin 9/18/2018 9/18/2018 2018-Ohio-3762
State v. Williams 17AP-552Judgment affirmed and motion overruled. The trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s motion for jail-time credit under R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(g)(iii) where, at the time of filing the motion, there was no transcript in the record of the sentencing hearing to demonstrate an error that would give the trial court jurisdiction to consider appellant’s claim. Appellant’s motion to move to judgment is overruled as moot.HortonFranklin 9/13/2018 9/13/2018 2018-Ohio-3682
State v. Balderson 17AP-690Judgment affirmed. The trial court made all of the necessary findings at the sentencing hearing to impose consecutive sentences.KlattFranklin 9/13/2018 9/13/2018 2018-Ohio-3683
Franklin Cty. Sheriff v. Teamsters Local No. 413 17AP-717Appeal from decision confirming an arbitrator's award and denying a motion to vacate the award. Trial court did not err in finding the grievance was arbitrable and upholding arbitrator's decision to reduce discipline and reinstate the grievants.TyackFranklin 9/13/2018 9/13/2018 2018-Ohio-3684
State ex rel. Thomas v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth. 17AP-720Appellant failed to provide clear and convincing evidence that he was denied parole based on impermissible discrimination.TyackFranklin 9/13/2018 9/13/2018 2018-Ohio-3685
State ex rel. Hillman v. Blunt 17AP-793No party filed objections to the magistrate’s decision recommending the dismissal of relator’s complaint for writ of procedendo as moot, as the trial court has ruled on the motion that prompted relator to file the complaint. Finding no error of law or defect in the magistrate’s decision, it is adopted in in its entirely. Respondent’s motion to dismiss and motion for leave to file a motion to dismiss instanter are sustained and relator’s complaint for writ of procedendo is dismissed.HortonFranklin 9/13/2018 9/13/2018 2018-Ohio-3686