Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 362 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Feathers v. Ohio Dept. Rehab. & Corr. 16AP-588Court of Claims decision denying appellant's negligence claim was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. There was some evidence supporting magistrate's conclusion that appellant was not returning from recreation when he fell and, therefore, a regulation requiring inmates to be escorted when returning from recreation did not apply. Additionally, there was some evidence supporting the magistrate's conclusion that appellee did not breach its duty of care to appellant. There was no defect on the stairs where appellant fell and appellant admitted that he was able to hold the handrail while ascending the stairs and did not ask for assistanceDorrianFranklin 10/12/2017 10/12/2017 2017-Ohio-8179
Habegger v. Owens Community College 17AP-297 & 17AP-301Not all nursing students were barred from pursuing a breach of contract claim against college which lost part of its accreditationTyackFranklin 10/12/2017 10/12/2017 2017-Ohio-8180
State ex rel. DPWN Holdings (USA), Inc. v. Indus. Comm. 16AP-370The commission did not abuse its discretion in the application of special circumstances or in the calculation of the AWW. Writ of mandamus denied.Luper SchusterFranklin 10/10/2017 10/10/2017 2017-Ohio-8148
Pla v. Cleveland State Univ. 17AP-212The trial court did not err in requiring appellant to pay $875 in attorney fees to appellee as a precondition to her refiling her motion for sanctions. The original motion for sanctions was dismissed because appellant's counsel did not timely appear at the hearing on that motion. Further, the trial court did not err in denying appellant's refiled motion for sanctions. Judgment affirmed.Luper SchusterFranklin 10/10/2017 10/10/2017 2017-Ohio-8149
State v. Brisco 16AP-759Trial evidence supported jury verdict of guilty as to felony murder based on felonious assault. Taking the weapon involved in a shooting outside the residence and placing it in a trash can could be construed as tampering with evidence, even though the defendant later told police where the gun was located.TyackFranklin 10/5/2017 10/5/2017 2017-Ohio-8089
Cleve Corp. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision 17AP-137Cleve Corp. appealed the decision of the BTA. The UPS distribution facility was found to be a "special purpose" property for appraisal methodology. The decision of the BTA is affirmed.TyackFranklin 10/5/2017 10/5/2017 2017-Ohio-8090
State v. Mobarak 14AP-517Trial court did not err when it denied motion in limine. Trial court did not err in ordering consecutive sentences.BrownFranklin 9/29/2017 9/29/2017 2017-Ohio-7999
State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Nursing Homes, Inc. v. Ohio Dept. of Medicaid 16AP-102In a plurality decision, longstanding deposition discovery disputes settled by the trial court eight years after being presented were reviewed by the court of appeals with the appeal being dismissed in part for lack of final appealable order, specific decisions being affirmed and others being reversed on issues relating to the attorney-client privilege, the work produce doctrine and waiver.BrunnerFranklin 9/29/2017 9/29/2017 2017-Ohio-8000
Lerner v. Broadview NH, L.L.C. 16AP-512While the trial court correctly determined that some of plaintiff's claims were medical claims subject to a one-year statute of limitations, the complaint did not contain enough information to characterize other claims as medical claims, and thus, the trial court erred in dismissing those claims as time barred under R.C. 2305.113.KlattFranklin 9/29/2017 9/29/2017 2017-Ohio-8001
Ohio Bd. of Motor Vehicle Repair v. Tintmasters Internatl., L.L.C. 16AP-749, 16AP-864 & 16AP-865No final, appealable order existed because the judgment granting plaintiff summary judgment did not set forth any relief or adjudicate all plainitff's claims.KlattFranklin 9/29/2017 9/29/2017 2017-Ohio-8002