|
|
Benzle v. Benzle
| 25AP-995 | In an appeal of a divorce decree and judgment, appellant failed to provide a copy of the transcript as required by App.R. 9. Also, in the absence of any apparent procedural error by the trial court or cognizable legal authority supporting appellant’s assignments of error, we must presume the regularity of the proceedings and affirm the trial court’s judgment. Judgment affirmed. | Leland | Franklin |
7/23/2026
|
7/23/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2838 |
|
State v. Jarju
| 24AP-228 | Judgment affirmed. The appellant’s conviction for murder and tampering with evidence was not against the manifest weight of the evidence and was supported by sufficient evidence. The appellant was the only other person at the residence other than the deceased and her version of the incident was not believed. The record showed that the appellant hid the murder weapon and disclosed its location over a year after the murder. Gunshot residue and burns on appellant’s hands confirmed she was the shooter. The jury did not lose its way or commit a manifest miscarriage of justice warranting reversal and a new trial. | Boggs | Franklin |
7/23/2026
|
7/23/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2835 |
|
Gowda v. State Med. Bd.
| 25AP-708 | Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. The State Medical Board’s decision to permanently revoke appellant’s medical license and asses a fine was supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence. The Board was in the best position to determine appellant’s credibility and was able to look to surrounding circumstances to infer an intent by appellant to deceive. Further, appellant’s arguments that the Board imposed disproportionate sanctions and did not take into account mitigating circumstances are overruled. The sanctions imposed by the Board were supported by reliable, probative, and substantial evidence and are within the bounds of R.C. 4731.22. | Boggs | Franklin |
7/23/2026
|
7/23/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2837 |
|
O'Neal v. Reeves
| 25AP-635 | The trial court properly held appellee in contempt of the decree of divorce. Appellant timely appealed trial court's judgment entry adopting the magistrate's decision. However, appellant failed to file objections to the magistrate's decision with the trial court, thereby waiving all but plain error on appeal. Although appellant filed a transcript of the proceedings, appellant failed to argue plain error in the appellate brief and did not demonstrate error by reference to the record. Accordingly, appellant failed to establish reversible error. The judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Division of Domestic Relations and Juvenile Branch, is affirmed. | Jamison | Franklin |
7/23/2026
|
7/23/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2836 |
|
Gustafson v. Ohio State Univ.
| 25AP-936 | The Court of Claims did not err in granting summary judgment to appellee on appellants’ claims for negligence, negligence per se, and loss of consortium. The defect in the sidewalk was insubstantial as a matter of law under the two-inch rule, and appellants did not introduce any evidence that attendant circumstances rendered the defect in the sidewalk substantial. Appellants could not show a genuine issue of material fact related to negligence per se where the municipal ordinances did not impose a duty on property owners to pedestrians. Because the loss of consortium claim is derivative of the negligence and negligence per se claims, the trial court correctly determined it also fails. Judgment affirmed. | Edelstein | Franklin |
7/21/2026
|
7/21/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2792 |
|