|
|
In re Estate of Ashworth
| 25AP-832 | Appellant’s attorney requested fees for his work in the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Probate Division. After a hearing, judgment was issued reducing appellant’s attorney’s fees for his work on the estate. On appeal, appellant failed to provide a transcript, thus, the court cannot review his claimed error. Judgment of trial court affirmed. | Jamison | Franklin |
8/13/2026
|
8/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3110 |
|
Integrity Constr. II, Inc. v. Severino Constr., Inc.
| 25AP-138 | On appeal from a decision denying a construction subcontractor’s motion to stay proceedings and compel arbitration against a lower-tier subcontractor. The subcontractor’s contract with the lower-tier subcontractor did not contain an arbitration clause, and it did not contain a flow-down provision allowing the subcontractor to enforce an arbitration clause that was contained in the subcontractor’s contract with the general contractor. Judgment affirmed. | Dingus | Franklin |
8/13/2026
|
8/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3109 |
|
Scharf v. Scharf
| 24AP-443 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying father's proposed shared parenting plan and awarding sole custody to the mother. Moreover, the trial court was well within its discretion to strike father's shared parenting plan as untimely when it was filed the day before the eighth day of trial. The trial court abused its discretion in imputing income to both parties where (1) it ignored income in the record for father; and (2) failed to expressly find that mother was unemployed or underemployed. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in declining to award mother spousal support or attorneys fees. Mother's claim that the trial court erred in awarding each parent the right to claim one of the children for tax purposes was barred by the invited error doctrine. Mother's claims regarding errors on the child support worksheet, calculation of work-related childcare, and extraordinary medical expenses were sustained to the extent that the improperly calculated income may have affected those calculations and allocations. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part. | Jamison | Franklin |
8/11/2026
|
8/11/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3076 |
|
CME Fed. Credit Union v. Williams
| 26AP-52 | ARBITRATION — APP.R. 4(A) — UNTIMELY APPEAL — FINAL, APPEALABLE ORDER — R.C. 2711.02: Because the trial court’s entry denying appellant’s motions for a stay pending arbitration was a final, appealable order under R.C. 2711.02(C) and appellant’s assignments of error all pertain to the trial court’s denial of those motions, appellant’s notice of appeal was untimely. Appeal dismissed as untimely pursuant to App.R. 4(A)(1). | Edelstein | Franklin |
8/11/2026
|
8/11/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3081 |
|
J.W. v. N.W.
| 25AP-586 | The trial court did not err in granting appellee’s petition for a domestic violence civil protection order (“DVCPO”) against appellant. Any error in admitting the challenged hearsay evidence was harmless. The trial court’s granting of the DVCPO was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. And the trial court did not abuse its discretion in defining the scope and terms of the DVCPO. Judgment affirmed. | Dingus | Franklin |
8/6/2026
|
8/6/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3034 |
|