Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 200 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re S.W. 25AP-351, 25AP-352, 25AP-353, 25AP-372, 25AP-374, 25AP-375The trial court’s decision awarding permanent custody to Franklin County Children Services was against the manifest weight of the evidence, where the court committed pervasive factual errors in its best interest analysis under R.C. 2151.414(D)(1) and failed to properly consider whether parents could provide a legally secure permanent placement for the children. Judgment reversed and vacated, temporary custody reinstated, and cause remanded to the trial court for a new case plan and for further proceedings.DingusFranklin 7/31/2026 7/31/2026 2026-Ohio-2955
Denham v. Columbus City Schools 25AP-980Judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. The unambiguous language in Adm.Code 3301-20-03(C) does not prohibit the release of an employee by a school district, and therefore the trial court did not abuse its discretion. The trial court’s interpretation of the Adm.Code 3301-20-03(C) also did not improperly impose a retroactive application of that provision.BoggsFranklin 7/31/2026 7/31/2026 2026-Ohio-2956
State ex rel. Fox v. Indus. Comm. 24AP-140In this mandamus action, the magistrate erred in determining that, pursuant to R.C. 4123.56(F), relator was not entitled to receive temporary total disability compensation after her retirement with respondent. Objections sustained in part, and overruled in part; writ of mandamus granted.DingusFranklin 7/30/2026 7/30/2026 2026-Ohio-2922
State v. Anderson 24AP-188Having found a non-frivolous issue regarding appellant's speedy trial claims, we set aside counsel's Anders brief and appoint new counsel to represent appellant on appeal.JamisonFranklin 7/30/2026 7/30/2026 2026-Ohio-2923
State v. Henry 25AP-461Appellant’s convictions for the misdemeanor offenses of domestic violence and assault were supported by sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court’s judgment is affirmed.DorrianFranklin 7/30/2026 7/30/2026 2026-Ohio-2924
12345678910...>>