Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 235 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Whitling v. Whitling CA2016-08-146Divorce, pro se litigants, record on appeal, bias, prejudice.PiperButler 10/16/2017 10/16/2017 2017-Ohio-8197
State v. Trammell CA2016-11-220, CA2016-11-221, CA2016-11-222Admission of parole officer's inadmissible hearsay testimony that the tipster had seen defendant inside the home the day before it was searched was harmless error where ample evidence was presented at trial that defendant was an occupant of the house. Defendant's convictions for heroin possession, drug paraphernalia possession, trafficking in heroin, and having weapons under disability were not against the manifest weight of the evidence.M. PowellButler 10/16/2017 10/16/2017 2017-Ohio-8198
Carson v. Duff CA2017-03-005, CA2017-03-007The trial court's decision denying appellants' adverse possession claim against cotenants was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where appellants failed to satisfy their high burden of proof to establish they or their predecessors engaged in overt acts of unequivocal character that showed a definite and continuous assertion of adverse right to the disputed property so as to establish their adverse possession claim.S. PowellFayette 10/16/2017 10/16/2017 2017-Ohio-8199
Curry v. Curry CA2016-07-136The trial court did not abuse its discretion in dividing marital property and ordering spousal support where the court first considered all relevant statutory factors such as the 15-year age difference between the parties, appellee's need to save for retirement, and the allocation of debt to appellee.PiperButler 10/9/2017 10/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8127
State v. Prickett CA2017-01-010Appellant's convictions for theft were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the state presented surveillance videos of the thefts, appellant stipulated the person depicted on the videos did not have authorization to remove the cigarettes from the stores without paying, and the charging officer identified appellant as the perpetrator of the thefts after comparing appellant's booking photograph to the stores' surveillance videos.HendricksonButler 10/9/2017 10/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8128
Clarkwestern Dietrich Bldg. Sys., L.L.C. v. Certified Steel Stud Assn. CA2017-04-040Trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding the plaintiff demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the appointment of a receiver was appropriate and necessary to investigate and prosecute breach of fiduciary duty claim.S. PowellButler 10/9/2017 10/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8129
State v. Harris CA2017-03-026The trial court properly accepted appellant's guilty plea where such was made knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently.PiperWarren 10/9/2017 10/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8130
Lineback v. Lineback CA2017-03-033Trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Wife's motion to reduce spousal support where she failed to sustain her burden of proof. RinglandWarren 10/9/2017 10/9/2017 2017-Ohio-8131
State v. Coleman CA2017-02-023Sufficient evidence and the greater weight of the evidence supported defendant's convictions for having a weapon while under disability, using a weapon while intoxicated, and aggravated menacing where police located an operable firearm in the location a witness observed the defendant place the firearm, where the defendant smelled of an alcoholic beverage and exhibited other indicia of impairment, and where defendant threatened to beat the victim and then retrieved a firearm and waved it in the air.RinglandButler 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 2017-Ohio-8036
Geran v. State CA2017-04-041The trial court did not err by denying appellant's petition for sex offender re-classification as appellant was properly classified as a sex offender since he was serving a consecutive, aggregate sentence for a sexually oriented offense both at the time the requirements went into effect and when appellant's classification hearing was held.S. PowellButler 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 2017-Ohio-8037
12345678910...>>