Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:

-Ohio-

Citation:

WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.

Hide Topics and Issues column This search returned 272 rows. Rows per page:

State v. Carter

2025-CA-90

Appellant failed to present any assignment of error, argument, evidence, or legal authority in his brief related to the judgment denying the successive petition for postconviction relief from which he appealed. Judgment affirmed.

Huffman

Clark

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3753

State v. McGraw

2025-CA-61

Appellant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily entered his guilty pleas. The trial court complied with Crim.R. 11(C), and nothing indicates that when he entered his pleas, he was confused as to the charges to which he was pleading guilty or that he was threatened or coerced to enter his pleas. Judgment affirmed.

Huffman

Clark

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3756

In re E.V.

2026-CA-27

Father appeals the juvenile court’s order granting permanent custody of his child to a public children’s services agency. The permanent custody award is not against the manifest weight of the evidence, nor is it unsupported by clear and convincing evidence. The juvenile court also did not err in concluding that the agency made reasonable efforts to reunify father with the child. Judgment affirmed.

Hanseman

Greene

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3754

State v. Lee

2026-CA-22

The trial court did not err by allowing an investigating detective’s statement to be read at appellant’s sentencing hearing or by allowing the State to adopt the statement as its position on the seriousness factors in felony sentencing in R.C. 2929.12. This procedure did not violate R.C. 2929.19(A), nor was it otherwise contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.

Tucker

Greene

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3755

State v. Boyd

30696

In this appeal from the denial of appellant’s petition for postconviction relief, the issues relating to the sufficiency of the evidence and inconsistent verdicts are barred by res judicata. The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled appellant’s petition, which was based on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. Judgment affirmed.

Epley

Montgomery

9/25/2026

2026-Ohio-3752

...