|
|
State v. Combs
| 2025-CA-33 | Appellant’s individual sentences are not contrary to law, and given her extensive criminal history, the record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support the trial court’s consecutive-sentence findings. The aggregate prison term resulting from the imposition of consecutive sentences was not unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment. Judgment affirmed. | Huffman | Champaign |
8/7/2026
|
8/7/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3043 |
|
Baxter v. Baxter
| 2025-CA-63 | The trial court did not abuse its discretion in finding appellant in contempt for failing to pay his former wife both his portion of the expenses for the parties’ minor children and her share of the equity in the marital home, as required by the final decree of divorce. The court correctly determined that res judicata bars appellant’s claim for expenses for the children that could have been raised in the parties’ prior contempt proceeding. Judgment affirmed. | Huffman | Greene |
8/7/2026
|
8/7/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3041 |
|
State v. Dale
| 2026-CA-9 | The trial court did not err in overruling appellant’s post-sentence motion to withdraw a guilty plea to felonious assault. The record fails to support appellant’s claims that the plea was invalid under Crim.R. 11, that it was tainted by ineffective assistance of counsel, or that breaches of an underlying plea agreement nullified it. Judgment affirmed. | Tucker | Greene |
8/7/2026
|
8/7/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3044 |
|
Capital One NA v. Legend
| 30757 | The trial court did not err when it determined that appellee’s affidavit and exhibits in support of summary judgment were sufficient under Civ.R. 56 and that no genuine issue of material fact remained for trial on appellee’s claim for a judgment on appellant’s unpaid credit card account. Judgment affirmed. | Epley | Montgomery |
8/7/2026
|
8/7/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3042 |
|
In re N.A.
| 30743, 30754 | Mother appeals the trial court’s order granting temporary custody of one of her children to a public children’s services agency and temporary custody of another one of her children to appellee-father. The record supports the conclusion that the trial court’s temporary custody order was in each child’s best interest. Judgment affirmed. | Tucker | Montgomery |
8/7/2026
|
8/7/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3045 |
|