Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 144 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Kegley 3-18-03The trial court did not err by recasting defendant-appellant’s motion to vacate as a petition for postconviction relief or by subsequently denying the petition because a trial court's failure to order and consider a presentence investigation as it is required to do under R.C. 2951.03(A) and Crim.R. 32.2 when imposing community control for a felony offense renders a sentence voidable, not void.PrestonCrawford 10/15/2018 10/15/2018 2018-Ohio-4167
State v. Clark 8-18-10The trial court’s ruling on a motion to reconsider a final judgment entry imposing a sentence was not a final, appealable order. Appeal dismissed. ShawLogan 10/15/2018 10/15/2018 2018-Ohio-4168
Nelsons v. Ohio High School Athletic Assn. 1-18-12The trial court erred in granting Appellees’ complaint seeking to enjoin the OHSAA’s enforcement of its determination of ineligibility to participate in interscholastic athletics.ShawAllen 10/15/2018 10/15/2018 2018-Ohio-4169
State v. Gamache 1-18-26A mere reference to unadjudicated offenses is not sufficient to warrant the reversal of a sentence. Appellate courts will not reverse a sentence unless the sentence is contrary to law or unsupported by the record.WillamowskiAllen 10/15/2018 10/15/2018 2018-Ohio-4170
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Bowman 17-18-05The trial court did not err in granting the insurance company’s motion for summary judgment finding that it had no duty to defend or indemnify its insured against the Appellants’ claims. ShawShelby 10/15/2018 10/15/2018 2018-Ohio-4171
State v. Kennedy 8-18-01Conviction for murder supported by sufficient evidence and not against the weight of the evidence. Trial counsel was not ineffective, plain error was not committed by the trial court, and the trial court did not err in declining to include a jury instruction on negligent homicide.ShawLogan 10/15/2018 10/15/2018 2018-Ohio-4172
Riehm v. Green Springs Rural Volunteer Fire Dept. 13-18-15Trial court erred by finding that an issue of fact existed as to whether volunteer firefighter's action was willful, wanton, or reckless.ShawSeneca 10/9/2018 10/9/2018 2018-Ohio-4075
Bishop v. Bishop 12-18-07Trial court did not err by naming father as the residential parent for the purpose of school district when both sides were appropriate and the trial court had to pick one.WillamowskiPutnam 10/9/2018 10/9/2018 2018-Ohio-4076
In re C.W. 5-18-04Trial court's decision to terminate parental rights was not against the manifest weight of the evidence when father had failed to visit or contact the child for more than 90 days, so abandoned the child. Trial court did not err in allowing the admission of screen shots of father's Facebook pages.WillamowskiHancock 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3837
State v. Kerns 8-18-05The trial court's sentence of the defendant-appellant was not contrary to law. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.ZimmermanLogan 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 2018-Ohio-3838