Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 94 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Blakely L-18-1207Trial court did not err in denying motion for leave to file a motion for new trial without an evidentiary hearing.PietrykowskiLucas 4/19/2019 4/19/2019 2019-Ohio-1483
Toledo v. Cook L-18-1146Trial court did not err in denying appellant’s motion to suppress. Officer’s testimony identified appellant as the offender. Judgment affirmed.OsowikLucas 4/19/2019 4/19/2019 2019-Ohio-1484
State v. Hopings L-18-1038Trial court ascertained appellant’s reasons for entering guilty plea under North Carolina v. Alford where it personally addressed him, he executed plea form, counsel spoke on his behalf, and state presented statement of evidence. Alford plea waived ability to appeal denial of suppression motion. No evidence in record to support claim that trial counsel failed to advise appellant that Alford plea waived right to appeal denial of suppression motion or failed to advise him to enter plea of no contest.MayleLucas 4/19/2019 4/19/2019 2019-Ohio-1486
Sullinger v. Sullinger L-18-1079Trial court’s financial-misconduct findings adverse to husband supported by competent, credible evidence. Amount awarded to wife for misconduct not abuse of discretion. Court properly considered (1) company’s future income stream to value business and (2) husband’s income to set spousal support, but remand necessary to clarify calculation of husband’s average income and whether obligation survives husband’s death. Court erred in awarding attorney fees not supported by itemized invoices.MayleLucas 4/19/2019 4/19/2019 2019-Ohio-1489
McNabb v. Ottawa Cty. Commrs. OT-17-036, OT-18-024Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Statute of limitationsSingerOttawa 4/19/2019 4/19/2019 2019-Ohio-1487
State v. Norris OT-18-019Trial court was not required to establish a factual basis for appellant’s guilty plea to domestic violence because a guilty plea constitutes a complete admission of guilt and waives any challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence.ZmudaOttawa 4/19/2019 4/19/2019 2019-Ohio-1488
State v. Graham WD-18-021Trial court erred in finding R.C. 2929.15(B)(1)(c)(ii) unconstitutional where it was not necessary to pass upon the constitutional question because the parties did not raise the issue.ZmudaWood 4/19/2019 4/19/2019 2019-Ohio-1485
State v. Tarr WD-18-044The trial court correctly determined it had no jurisdiction to vacate a tax lien, as provided by R.C. 5703.38.ZmudaWood 4/12/2019 4/12/2019 2019-Ohio-1386
State v. Pippin L-18-1023Maximum sentence for first felony domestic violence conviction was within guidelines, with nothing within the record demonstrating no support for trial court’s findings, and no indication the trial court considered victim impact statement regarding other, unindicted conduct in sentencing determination.ZmudaLucas 4/12/2019 4/12/2019 2019-Ohio-1387
State v. Eldridge L-18-1084Appellant’s conviction for disrupting public services was supported by sufficient evidence where identity is the only contested element and the state’s witnesses testified that appellant’s voice was heard over a loudspeaker threatening to shoot firefighters if they proceeded onto his property to extinguish an illegal fire.ZmudaLucas 4/5/2019 4/5/2019 2019-Ohio-1265