|
|
Long Point Energy, L.L.C. v. Gulfport Energy Corp.
| 26 BE 0007 | CERTIFICATION – App.R. 25(A); motion to certify a conflict; Ohio Constitution, Article IV, Section 3(B)(4); this court’s decision is not in conflict with the decisions cited by Appellant from the Fifth and Eleventh District Courts of Appeal; the two proposed questions are not dispositive; motion denied. | Per Curiam | Belmont |
10/23/2026
|
10/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4212 |
|
Long Point Energy, L.L.C. v. Gulfport Energy Corp.
| 26 BE 0007 | RECONSIDERATION – App.R. 26(A); application for reconsideration untimely filed; no “extraordinary circumstances” established; Appellant has not demonstrated any obvious errors or raised any issues that were not adequately addressed in our previous opinion; this court is not persuaded that we erred as a matter of law; application denied. | Per Curiam | Belmont |
10/23/2026
|
10/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4213 |
|
Wittkugle v. Davis
| 26 MA 0074 | forcible entry and detainer action; trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction; R.C. 1923.04; three-day notice not required to contain rent due amount | Hanni | Mahoning |
10/23/2026
|
10/23/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4199 |
|
State v. Peterson
| 26 MA 0045 | Defendant pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter, felonious assault, improper handling of a firearm in a motor vehicle, and obstructing justice; trial court’s explanation of effect of guilty plea substantially complied with Crim.R. 11; defendant agreed to testify at codefendant’s trial, but failed to do so; defendant’s breach of the plea agreement did not invalidate the guilty plea; presentence motion to withdraw plea was not supported by factors in State v. Fish, 104 Ohio App.3d 236 (1st Dist. 1995); defendant’s sentence was not contrary to law and consecutive sentence findings were supported by the record; judgment affirmed. | Waite | Mahoning |
10/23/2026
|
10/26/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4215 |
|
State v. Glenn
| 26 MA 0019 | Speedy trial; request for a continuance to locate missing material witness generally sufficient to toll reasonable time under Ohio law; in party stipulation to admissibility of evidence, that party cannot argue evidence was inadmissible; manifest weight standard of review where witness’ identification of the perpetrator at issue; no cumulative error without individual error. | Waite | Mahoning |
10/22/2026
|
10/23/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4174 |
|