Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 94 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Minaldi v. Nocera Holdings, L.L.C. 25 MA 0105CIVIL – magistrate’s decision adopted; objections not required; Civ.R. 53(C)(2); summary judgment; Civ.R. 56; de novo review; real estate transaction; Listing Agreement; brokerage fee; commission clause; null and void; Bona Fide Listing Agreement; judgment affirmed.DickeyMahoning 6/8/2026 6/9/2026 2026-Ohio-2154
State v. Smith 25 MA 0110CERTIFICATION – App.R. 25(A); pro se motion to certify a conflict; untimely filed; no conflict found between our decision and a decision of the Sixth District Court of Appeals; motion denied.Per CuriamMahoning 6/5/2026 6/8/2026 2026-Ohio-2146
State v. Smith 25 MA 0110RECONSIDERATION – App.R. 26(A); pro se application for reconsideration untimely filed; no “extraordinary circumstances” established; Appellant has not demonstrated any obvious errors or raised any issues that were not adequately addressed in our previous opinion; this court is not persuaded that we erred as a matter of law; application denied.Per CuriamMahoning 6/5/2026 6/8/2026 2026-Ohio-2147
State v. Williams 25 BE 0044Crim.R. 52(B), plain error; manifest miscarriage of justice; Evid.R. 801(C), hearsay; Evid.R. 801(D), not hearsay if prior inconsistent statement; Evid.R. 803, hearsay exceptions; Evid.R. 803(1), present sense impression; Evid.R. 803(2), excited utterance; spontaneity of declarant’s statements; abuse of discretion; Evid.R. 901(A), authentication of evidence; Evid.R. 902(11), self-authentication; silent witness theory; Confrontation Clause; Evid.R. 803(6), business records exception; vouching; testing verification; ineffective assistance of counsel; cumulative errorHanniBelmont 6/2/2026 6/2/2026 2026-Ohio-2061
Cedar One Properties, Ltd. v. Rudolph 26 HA 0003App.R. 26(A), application for reconsideration, obvious error, issues not fully addressed, App.R. 26(A)(1)(a), ten days to file application for reconsideration, App.R. 14(A) time computation, App.R. 14(B) enlargement of time for App.R. 26(A), for extraordinary circumstancesPer CuriamHarrison 5/28/2026 5/29/2026 2026-Ohio-2019
12345678910...>>