SCOH Lapel Pin Opinions and Announcements

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 417 rows. Rows per page: 
123456789
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
09/18/2025 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/18/2025 9/18/2025 2025-Ohio-4367
09/18/2025 Case Announcements #2  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/18/2025 9/18/2025 2025-Ohio-4368
09/17/2025 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/17/2025 9/17/2025 2025-Ohio-4355
State ex rel. M/I Homes of Cincinnati, L.L.C. v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections 2025-1088Prohibition—Mandamus—Elections—R.C. 519.12—Referendum petition’s brief summary of proposed zoning amendment was sufficient because it accurately described present zoning status of the affected land parcels, nature of the requested zoning change, and the affected acreage—Referendum petition’s brief summary was not required to enumerate series of features associated with proposed residential development on affected parcels if zoning amendment were enacted—Map accompanying referendum petition was appropriate and suitable because it would not mislead average person about the area affected by proposed zoning amendment—Writs denied.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4362 9/17/2025 9/17/2025 2025-Ohio-4362
State ex rel. Nelsonville v. Athens Cty. Bd. of Elections 2025-1061Mandamus—Prohibition—Elections—Writs sought to order board of elections to remove a slate of statutory offices from the general-election ballot—Writ of mandamus denied because relators identified no statute or other authority requiring board to remove the statutory offices from ballot—Writ of prohibition denied because board did not exercise quasi-judicial authority.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-4363 9/17/2025 9/17/2025 2025-Ohio-4363
09/17/2025 Case Announcements #2  Merit decisions with opinions.   9/17/2025 9/17/2025 2025-Ohio-4365
09/16/2025 Case Announcements  Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions.   9/16/2025 9/16/2025 2025-Ohio-3300
09/16/2025 Case Announcements #2  Appeals not accepted for review.   9/16/2025 9/16/2025 2025-Ohio-3301
09/16/2025 Case Announcements #3  Miscellaneous dismissals.   9/16/2025 9/16/2025 2025-Ohio-4338
09/16/2025 Case Announcements #4  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/16/2025 9/16/2025 2025-Ohio-4354
09/15/2025 Case Announcements  Official versions released—Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals—Mediation matters.   9/15/2025 9/15/2025 2025-Ohio-3312
09/12/2025 Case Announcements  Miscellaneous dismissals.   9/12/2025 9/12/2025 2025-Ohio-3290
09/12/2025 Case Announcements #2  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/12/2025 9/12/2025 2025-Ohio-3306
09/11/2025 Administrative Actions  Administrative actions.   9/11/2025 9/11/2025 2025-Ohio-3269
09/10/2025 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases—Miscellaneous dismissals—Mediation matters.   9/10/2025 9/10/2025 2025-Ohio-3249
State ex rel. Vermilion Campaign Commt. for Jean A. Anderson v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Elections 2025-1079Elections—Mandamus—R.C. 3513.31(F)—Relators failed to strictly comply with the requirements to fill a vacancy caused by a withdrawn candidate under R.C. 3513.31(F)—Writ denied.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-3250 9/10/2025 9/10/2025 2025-Ohio-3250
09/10/2025 Case Announcements #2  Merit decisions with opinions.   9/10/2025 9/10/2025 2025-Ohio-3263
09/10/2025 Case Announcements #3  Miscellaneous orders.   9/10/2025 9/10/2025 2025-Ohio-3265
09/10/2025 Case Announcements #4  Reconsideration of prior decisions.   9/10/2025 9/10/2025 2025-Ohio-3266
09/09/2025 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/9/2025 9/9/2025 2025-Ohio-3203
09/08/2025 Case Announcements  Miscellaneous dismissals.   9/8/2025 9/8/2025 2025-Ohio-3179
09/08/2025 Case Announcements #2  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/8/2025 9/8/2025 2025-Ohio-3181
09/08/2025 Case Announcements #3  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/8/2025 9/8/2025 2025-Ohio-3191
09/05/2025 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/5/2025 9/5/2025 2025-Ohio-3162
09/05/2025 Case Announcements #2  Merit decisions without opinions.   9/5/2025 9/5/2025 2025-Ohio-3180
09/04/2025 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/4/2025 9/4/2025 2025-Ohio-3138
09/04/2025 Case Announcements #2  Appeals not accepted for review.   9/4/2025 9/4/2025 2025-Ohio-3140
09/03/2025 Case Announcements  Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review.   9/3/2025 9/3/2025 2025-Ohio-3107
09/03/2025 Case Announcements #2  Motion and procedural rulings.   9/3/2025 9/3/2025 2025-Ohio-3139
09/02/2025 Case Announcements  Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions.   9/2/2025 9/2/2025 2025-Ohio-3078
09/02/2025 Case Announcements #2  Official versions released—Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings.   9/2/2025 9/2/2025 2025-Ohio-3106
State ex rel. LeadingAge Ohio v. Ohio Dept. of Medicaid 2024-1075Mandamus—Writ sought to compel Department of Medicaid and its director to recalculate and pay nursing-home quality incentive payments according to formula set forth in R.C. 5125.26—Department and directory failed in their duty to apply R.C. 5125.26 as enacted by General Assembly—Writ granted but request for attorney fees and expenses denied.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-3066 9/2/2025 9/2/2025 2025-Ohio-3066
08/29/2025 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings.   8/29/2025 8/29/2025 2025-Ohio-3089
08/29/2025 Case Announcements #2  Motion and procedural rulings.   8/29/2025 8/29/2025 2025-Ohio-3098
State ex rel. Jennewine v. Puffenberger 2024-1238Mandamus—Quo warranto—R.C. 503.24—Writ of mandamus will not issue to remove township-trustee board member from position to which she was appointed by committee of five under R.C. 503.24, because quo warranto is the exclusive remedy by which to have her removed and presiding probate-court judge cannot be compelled by issuance of a writ of mandamus to appoint someone to the position under the same statute since the position is presently occupied—Writ denied.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-3041 8/28/2025 8/28/2025 2025-Ohio-3041
08/28/2025 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings.   8/28/2025 8/28/2025 2025-Ohio-3061
In re Application of Ohio Power Co. 2024-1142Public Utilities—Rate design of basic-transmission-cost rider—R.C. 4928.02—R.C. 4928.05—R.C. 4928.143—Adm.Code 4901:1-36-04(B)—In approving continuation of nonbypassable rate design for electric-utility-service provider’s basic-transmission-cost rider in provider’s application for approval of fifth electric-security plan, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio complied with statutory requirements in R.C. 4928.05, regulatory requirements in Adm.Code 4901:1-36-04(B), and state electric policy in R.C.4928.02 and maintained consistency with its past practice—Orders affirmed.Kennedy, C.J.Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-3034 8/27/2025 8/27/2025 2025-Ohio-3034
Disciplinary Counsel v. Stanley 2025-0990On certification of default.   8/27/2025 8/27/2025 2025-Ohio-3042
08/27/2025 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions—Disciplinary cases.   8/27/2025 8/27/2025 2025-Ohio-3050
08/27/2025 Case Announcements #2  Merit decisions without opinions.   8/27/2025 8/27/2025 2025-Ohio-3051
08/27/2025 Case Announcements #3  Merit decisions without opinions.   8/27/2025 8/27/2025 2025-Ohio-3053
08/27/2025 Case Announcements #4  Motion and procedural rulings—Reconsideration of prior decisions.   8/27/2025 8/27/2025 2025-Ohio-3059
08/27/2025 Case Announcements #5  Motion and procedural rulings.   8/27/2025 8/27/2025 2025-Ohio-3060
State ex rel. Urban v. Wano Expiditing, Inc. 2024-1155Workers’ compensation—Permanent-total-disability (“PTD”) compensation—Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i)—Industrial Commission complied with Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i) by considering claimant’s psychological as well as physical conditions before concluding that he could engage in sustained remunerative employment and therefore denying his application for PTD compensation—Adm.Code 4121-3-34(D)(3)(i) does not require a hearing officer to identify every recommended restriction in a medical report that the hearing officer relies on—Court of appeals’ judgment issuing writ of mandamus directing commission to vacate its order reversed.Per CuriamSlip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-3009 8/26/2025 8/26/2025 2025-Ohio-3009
08/26/2025 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings.   8/26/2025 8/26/2025 2025-Ohio-3040
08/25/2025 Case Announcements  Motion and procedural rulings.   8/25/2025 8/25/2025 2025-Ohio-3013
In re Application of Dayton Power & Light Co. 2021-1473Public utilities—Significantly-excessive-earnings test—R.C. 4928.143(F)—Public Utilities Commission not authorized to allow utility to retain significantly excessive earnings from electric security plan based on utility’s commitment to make future investments—Orders reversed and cause remanded to commission to conduct new significantly-excessive-earnings-test analysis.Kennedy, C.J.Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-2953 8/22/2025 8/22/2025 2025-Ohio-2953
08/22/2025 Case Announcements  Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings.   8/22/2025 8/22/2025 2025-Ohio-2998
Hunt v. Alderman 2023-1463Civil procedure—Service of process—Sufficient service under Civ.R. 4.1(A)(1)(a) requires using an address that is reasonably calculated to apprise the defendant of the lawsuit—Service to defendant-appellee’s former residential address was not reasonably calculated to provide notice, so it was insufficient—Court of appeals’ judgment affirming trial court’s award of summary judgment to appellee for lack of proper service affirmed.Deters, J.Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-2944 8/21/2025 8/21/2025 2025-Ohio-2944
E.A.K.M. v. M.A.M. 2024-0587R.C. 2505.02—Final orders—An interlocutory order requiring payment of guardian-ad-litem fees in ongoing divorce and child-custody proceeding is not a final order under R.C. 2505.02(B)—Court of appeals’ judgment vacated.DeWine, J.Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-2946 8/21/2025 8/21/2025 2025-Ohio-2946
123456789
Home | Contact Us | Search |