|
| Case Caption | Case No. | Topics and Issues | Author | Citation / County | Decided | Posted | WebCite |
|
State ex rel. Clark v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.
| 2024-1363 | Mandamus—Public-records requests—Relator failed to show that latent recordings he requested currently exist or that they existed when public-records custodian received his public-records requests, and writ and relator’s request for statutory damages denied as to those public-records requests—Respondent provided copies of kites relator requested, and writ denied as moot and relator’s request for statutory damages denied as to that public-records request—Writ held in abeyance as to the post orders that relator requested, and respondent ordered to file under seal for in camera inspection copies of the post orders. | DeWine, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5552 |
12/16/2025
|
12/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5552 |
|
12/16/2025 Administrative Actions #2
| | Administrative actions. | | |
12/16/2025
|
12/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5586 |
|
12/16/2025 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Merit decisions without opinions. | | |
12/16/2025
|
12/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5578 |
|
12/16/2025 Administrative Actions
| | Administrative actions. | | |
12/16/2025
|
12/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5579 |
|
12/16/2025 Administrative Actions #3
| | Administrative actions. | | |
12/16/2025
|
12/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5587 |
|
State v. Bostick
| 2024-0458 | Criminal law—Crim.R. 33(A)(6) requires that a trial court conduct an evidentiary hearing on a motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence, but it does not require that the hearing be a formal, oral hearing—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. | Deters, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5559 |
12/16/2025
|
12/16/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5559 |
|
In re Resigantion of McMahon
| 2025-1409 | Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). | | |
12/15/2025
|
12/15/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5554 |
|
12/15/2025 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
12/15/2025
|
12/15/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5563 |
|
In re Resigantion of Ulinski
| 2025-1153 | Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). | | |
12/15/2025
|
12/15/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5553 |
|
In re Resignation of Westfall
| 2025-1454 | Attorneys at law—Resignation with disciplinary action pending—Gov.Bar R. VI(11)(C). | | |
12/12/2025
|
12/12/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5540 |
|
12/12/2025 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
12/12/2025
|
12/12/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5542 |
|
12/11/2025 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/11/2025
|
12/11/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5502 |
|
12/11/2025 Case Announcements #2
| | Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/11/2025
|
12/11/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5539 |
|
12/10/2025 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions without opinions—Disciplinary cases. | | |
12/10/2025
|
12/10/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5488 |
|
12/10/2025 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/10/2025
|
12/10/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5501 |
|
Disciplinary Counsel v. Greulich
| 2025-1512 | On certificate of default. | | |
12/10/2025
|
12/10/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5480 |
|
12/09/2025 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
12/9/2025
|
12/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5477 |
|
12/09/2025 Case Announcements #5
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/9/2025
|
12/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5490 |
|
12/09/2025 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review—Appeals not accepted for review—Reconsideration of prior decisions. | | |
12/9/2025
|
12/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5429 |
|
12/09/2025 Case Announcements #4
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/9/2025
|
12/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5489 |
|
12/09/2025 Case Announcements #3
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/9/2025
|
12/9/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5478 |
|
12/08/2025 Case Announcements
| | Official versions released—Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/8/2025
|
12/8/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5452 |
|
12/05/2025 Case Announcements #2
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/5/2025
|
12/5/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5443 |
|
12/05/2025 Administrative Actions #2
| | Administrative actions. | | |
12/5/2025
|
12/5/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5428 |
|
12/05/2025 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals. | | |
12/5/2025
|
12/5/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5425 |
|
12/05/2025 Administrative Actions
| | Administrative actions. | | |
12/5/2025
|
12/5/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5426 |
|
Disciplinary Counsel v. Rossi
| 2024-1722 | Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including making false statement in a pleading and attempting to thwart prosecution of a criminal case—Six-month suspension. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5398 |
12/5/2025
|
12/5/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5398 |
|
Disciplinary Counsel v. Fusco
| 2024-1404 | Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct—Indefinite suspension with no credit for time served under interim felony suspension. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5397 |
12/5/2025
|
12/5/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5397 |
|
Disciplinary Counsel v. Gill
| 2025-0483 | Attorneys—Misconduct—Violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct relating to attorney’s client trust accounts—Two-year suspension with 18 months conditionally stayed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5392 |
12/4/2025
|
12/4/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5392 |
|
State v. Jones
| 2023-0772 | Criminal law—R.C. 2945.67(A)—App.R. 5(C)—Under App.R. 5(C), in seeking leave to appeal certain trial-court decisions, the State must claim that errors occurred in trial-court proceedings and must show how likely it is that those errors did in fact occur—Court of appeals erred in denying the State leave to appeal trial court’s decision granting appellee a new trial by failing to determine whether the State had demonstrated a high enough probability of trial-court error to warrant a discretionary appeal—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded to court of appeals. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5389 |
12/4/2025
|
12/4/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5389 |
|
Disciplinary Counsel v. Collins
| 2025-0793 | Attorneys—Misconduct—Misrepresentation in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct—Conditionally stayed two-year suspension. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5393 |
12/4/2025
|
12/4/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5393 |
|
12/04/2025 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions. | | |
12/4/2025
|
12/4/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5408 |
|
12/03/2025 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Merit decisions without opinions—Motion and procedural rulings—Appeals accepted for review. | | |
12/3/2025
|
12/3/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5386 |
|
State ex rel. Papageorgiou v. Avalotis Corp.
| 2025-0429 | Workers’ compensation—Industrial Commission did not abuse its discretion in denying claimant’s request for temporary-total-disability compensation after finding that he had voluntarily abandoned his employment by not accepting employer’s job offer of light-duty work following work-related injury—Court of appeals’ judgment denying writ of mandamus affirmed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5371 |
12/3/2025
|
12/3/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5371 |
|
Sparks v. Frederick
| 2025-0424 | Habeas corpus—Statement contained in affidavit of indigency that inmate submitted with his habeas petition does not set forth inmate-account balance “for each of the preceding six months,” as required by R.C. 2969.25(C)(1)—Court of appeals’ dismissal of petition affirmed. | Per Curaim | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5370 |
12/3/2025
|
12/3/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5370 |
|
12/03/2025 Case Announcements #4
| | Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
12/3/2025
|
12/3/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5396 |
|
Disciplinary Counsel v. Mollica
| 2025-0792 | Attorneys—Misconduct—Misrepresentation in violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct—Conditionally stayed one-year suspension. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5372 |
12/3/2025
|
12/3/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5372 |
|
12/03/2025 Case Announcements #2
| | Merit decisions without opinions. | | |
12/3/2025
|
12/3/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5387 |
|
12/03/2025 Case Announcements #3
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Miscellaneous dismissals—Mediation matters. | | |
12/3/2025
|
12/3/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5395 |
|
Seelbaugh v. Montgomery Cty. Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Relations Div.
| 2025-0070 | Prohibition—Court of appeals correctly dismissed domestic-relations court from action because a court of common pleas is not sui juris and cannot be sued—Appellant failed to show that domestic-relations court or county child-support-enforcement agency patently and unambiguously lack subject-jurisdiction in his divorce and child-support cases, and appellant had adequate remedies in ordinary course of law to challenge agency’s finding him in default of his child-support order and magistrate’s finding him in contempt—An opportunity to file objections to a magistrate’s decision qualifies as an adequate remedy in ordinary course of law—Court of appeals’ judgment granting appellees’ motions to dismiss affirmed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5297 |
12/2/2025
|
12/2/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5297 |
|
12/02/2025 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions. | | |
12/2/2025
|
12/2/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5383 |
|
State ex rel. Conomy v. Rohrer
| 2024-1786 | Mandamus—Procedendo—Court of appeals correctly dismissed appellant’s mandamus claim against common-pleas-court judge presiding over misdemeanor case against appellant because a writ of mandamus will not issue to control how judicial discretion is exercised—Court of appeals correctly dismissed appellant’s procedendo claim against judge because judge lacked jurisdiction to rule on motion to amend dismissal entry after dismissing case—Court of appeals correctly dismissed appellant’s mandamus claim against appellees because appellant had adequate remedy in ordinary course of law in form of a defamation action to obtain relief regarding allegedly false statements made by prosecutor—Court of appeals’ dismissal of petition affirmed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5296 |
12/2/2025
|
12/2/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5296 |
|
State ex rel. Fenstermaker v. VanEerten
| 2025-0381 | Mandamus—Public-records requests—Relator failed to present clear and convincing evidence rebutting evidence submitted by prosecutor’s office showing that cashbook he requested does not exist—Writ and relator’s request for statutory damages denied. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5298 |
12/2/2025
|
12/2/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5298 |
|
In re Six
| 2025-1543 | On certified entry of felony conviction. | | |
12/1/2025
|
12/1/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5355 |
|
12/01/2025 Case Announcements
| | Motion and procedural rulings—Disciplinary cases. | | |
12/1/2025
|
12/1/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5356 |
|
Eggleston v. Wood
| 2024-1791 | Civil procedure—Time for filing objections to magistrate’s decision—Civ.R. 53(D)(3)(b)(i)—Civ.R. 6(D)—Civ.R. 6(D) does not extend time party has to object to a magistrate’s decision that the clerk serves by United States mail or a commercial-carrier service—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5292 |
11/26/2025
|
11/26/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5292 |
|
11/26/2025 Case Announcements #2
| | Reconsideration of prior decisions. | | |
11/26/2025
|
11/26/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5319 |
|
11/26/2025 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
11/26/2025
|
11/26/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5316 |
|
State ex rel. Barker v. Muskingum Cty. Prosecutor's Office
| 2024-1670 | Mandamus—Public-records requests—Prosecutor’s office never received public-records request that relator attempted to submit using office’s online request form—Writ and relator’s requests for statutory damages, attorney’s fees, and court costs denied, and claim for injunctive relief under R.C. 149.351 dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5293 |
11/26/2025
|
11/26/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5293 |
|
State ex rel. Brown v. Columbiana Cty. Jail
| 2023-1218 | Mandamus—Public-records requests—Statutory damages—Relator has not shown by clear and convincing evidence that he successfully transmitted his requests by either hand delivery or certified mail or that he authorized another person to act as his agent to submit his requests by email—Relator’s request for statutory damages denied—Relator’s motion for contempt and sanctions denied because he has not shown that respondents disobeyed or resisted this court’s limited writ. | Dewine, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2025-Ohio-5280 |
11/26/2025
|
11/26/2025
| 2025-Ohio-5280 |
|