|
|
State v. Khalif
| 2024-0930 | Criminal law—R.C. 2901.09—"Stand your ground” amendment to self-defense law does not apply retroactively to offenses committed prior to amendment’s effective date—R.C. 2945.75(A)(2)—A guilty verdict constitutes a finding of guilty of the least degree of the offense charged unless verdict form states the degree of the offense or the elevating element—Verdict form does not support a finding of guilty for an elevated degree of an offense when the form states that the offense is “as charged in the indictment”—Failure to object to noncompliant verdict form forfeits all but plain error—Defendant failed to prove that noncompliant verdict form violated his substantial rights when he was sentenced for the offense for which he was indicted and found guilty—Judgment affirmed in part and reversed in part and cause remanded. | Deters, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2689 |
7/16/2026
|
7/16/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2689 |
|
State ex rel. Shepherd v. Gall
| 2025-1647 | Mandamus—Appellant failed to establish either a clear legal right to the requested relief or a clear legal duty on part of appellee to provide the requested relief—Appellant possessed an adequate remedy in ordinary course of law—Court of appeals’ dismissal affirmed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2690 |
7/16/2026
|
7/16/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2690 |
|
07/16/2026 Case Announcements
| | Merit decisions with opinions—Motion and procedural rulings. | | |
7/16/2026
|
7/16/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2706 |
|
Dayton Bar Assn. v. Baker
| 2025-0791 | Attorneys—Misconduct—Violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct, including engaging in conduct that involves dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation, is prejudicial to the administration of justice, and adversely reflects on practice of law—Two-year suspension with one year conditionally stayed. | Per Curiam | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2673 |
7/15/2026
|
7/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2673 |
|
Wells Fargo Bank, Natl. Assn. v. Doberdruk
| 2024-1669 and 2025-0071 | Civil law—Foreclosure sales—After the proceeds of a foreclosure sale are distributed, a common pleas court may grant relief to a party appealing the judgment of foreclosure by ordering restitution under R.C. 2329.45—Because restitution under R.C. 2329.45 remains a controversy redressable through appeal, a foreclosure appeal is not moot when the foreclosed party fails to obtain a stay of judgment—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed and cause remanded. | Hawkins, J. | Slip Opinion No. 2026-Ohio-2674 |
7/15/2026
|
7/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2674 |
|