Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 31 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Wilson 2016-L-039CRIMINAL LAW - SEARCH & SEIZURE - officer had reasonable articulable suspicion of criminal activity that warranted his investigatory stop of appellant after his commission of a bank robbery; Apprendi issue; waiver; plain error; since appellant waived his right to have jury try his RVO specification during his no contest plea and admitted all facts necessary to enhance his sentence as an RVO, the trial court did not commit plain error in sentencing him.RiceLake 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-902
State v. Corti 2016-L-129CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING/FINES, RESTITUTION, EXPUNGEMENT - trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences on five counts of burglary was not contrary to law as the statutory findings for such sentences were supported by the record.RiceLake 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-903
State v. Stroud 2017-A-0028CRIMINAL - Sexual Imposition; R.C. 2907.06(A)(1); intent; reckless; sexual contact; weight of the evidence; ineffective assistance of counsel; jury demandGrendellAshtabula 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-904
State v. Neuroth 2017-A-0054 CRIMINAL LAW - motion to suppress evidence; dispatch; hotel; report of chemical odor emanating from room; possible stolen vehicle; knock; several minutes to respond; officers notice no odor outside; invited into room; consent; odor apparent; probable cause; exigent circumstances; methamphetamine lab discovered in box springs; no error in denying motion.RiceAshtabula 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-905
In re K.Q. 2017-A-0060JUVENILE - termination of temporary custody; award of legal custody to a third party; R.C. 2151.011(B)(21); legal custody; intended to be permanent; not as drastic as permanent custody; best interest factors; R.C. 3109.04(F); no abuse of discretion. RiceAshtabula 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-906
Filby v. Filby 2017-G-0142APPELLATE REVIEW - vexatious litigator; R.C. 2323.52; leave to proceed; lack of jurisdiction; appeal dismissed.CannonGeauga 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-907
Aston v. Aston 2017-L-076APPELLATE REVIEW - trial court did not abuse its discretion in granting motion to modify parenting time because appellant failed to comply with numerous Ohio Appellate Rules regarding the procedural requirements for a brief; appellant failed to include table of contents, table of cases, statement of case, statement of facts supported by references to record, any assignments of error, a separate argument with citations to legal authority in support of each assignment of error, or a statement of issues presented for review.RiceLake 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-908
State v. Bolden 2017-L-106CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING/FINES, RESTITUTION, EXPUNGEMENT - since the trial court said it considered the seriousness factors in R.C. 2929.12 and discussed the pertinent factors as they related to this case, the trial court considered these factors and, for this reason, we cannot clearly and convincingly say appellant's sentence was contrary to law.RiceLake 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-909
State v. Karnofel 2017-T-0009CRIMINAL LAW - zoning; two counts of exterior maintenance violations; actively attempting to ameliorate; challenges weight of the evidence; defense to charges; no transcript; App.R. 9(B); appellate court cannot evaluate the evidence; appellant cannot demonstrate error.RiceTrumbull 3/12/2018 3/12/2018 2018-Ohio-910
State v. Cook 2016-G-0096CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCING - R.C. 2953.08(G)(2); contrary to law; R.C. 2929.11; R.C. 2929.12; sentencing factors; purposes and principles of felony sentencing; clearly and convincingly; supported by the record. ALLIED OFFENSES - merger; aggravated robbery; kidnapping; R.C. 2941.25; conduct of the accused; separate animus.CannonGeauga 3/5/2018 3/5/2018 2018-Ohio-788