Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 200 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Stepp CA2025-06-067The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion to request public records pursuant to R.C. 149.43(B)(8) and motion to compel discovery from the State pursuant to Crim. R. 16. Defendant's briefing on appeal identifies no pending litigation the documents he requested would be material to, does not demonstrate why Crim.R. 16 would be applicable to these post-trial proceedings, and otherwise wholly fails to cite and apply the standards of review and applicable law at issue in the appeal. Many of the defendant's appeals were frivolous and not reasonably grounded in fact or law and merit declaring the defendant a vexatious litigator.ByrneButler 9/21/2026 9/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3673
State v. White CA2025-08-087Appellant's knowing, voluntary, and intelligent guilty plea waived any constitutional violations unrelated to the entry of the guilty plea and any non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings. This includes claims made pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, of which a defect is non-jurisdictional, as well as speedy trial violations based upon R.C. 2945.71. His constitutional speedy trial rights were waived where he filed written waivers of his constitutional speedy trial rights in the case and the record is void of evidence that those waivers were not voluntary, knowing, or intelligent. Even if appellant did not waive his constitutional right to a speedy trial, he did not raise the constitutional issue below and failed to argue plain error on appeal.HendricksonButler 9/21/2026 9/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3675
State v. Jamison CA2026-01-010The trial court violated the appellant's right to counsel when it forced the appellant, who is indigent, to represent himself pro se at a suppression hearing. The constitutional violation also constituted structural error because it is always fundamentally unfair to deny an attorney to an indigent defendant. The structural error automatically reverses appellant's convictions since he objected to the error at the trial court.ByrneButler 9/21/2026 9/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3676
State v. Dennis CA2026-03-037The trial court properly imposed postrelease control.PiperButler 9/21/2026 9/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3677
State v. Brown CA2026-04-052Anders no error.Per CuriamButler 9/21/2026 9/21/2026 2026-Ohio-3678
12345678910...>>