|
|
State v. Cheney
| 6-26-07 | Crim.R.11(C)(2); Maximum Sentences; Right to Remain Silent. Trial court did not err in informing defendant of the minimum and maximum sentences for an indefinite sentence. Trial court properly advised defendant he could not be compelled to testify against himself at a trial during the change of plea hearing. | Willamowski | Hardin |
8/10/2026
|
8/10/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3062 |
|
State v. Short
| 11-25-12 | Manifest Weight; Waiver of Counsel; Misdemeanor Sentencing. The record demonstrated that defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to counsel in misdemeanor bench trial. Conviction for violating a protection order was not against the weight of the evidence. | Waldick | Paulding |
8/10/2026
|
8/10/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3063 |
|
State v. Carter
| 13-25-19, 13-25-20 | Manifest Weight; Ineffective Assistance. Convictions were not against the weight of the evidence. Trial counsel not ineffective for failing to file suppression motion. | Waldick | Seneca |
8/3/2026
|
8/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2989 |
|
State v. Stith
| 9-25-41 | Preindictment delay, actual prejudice, due process, motion to dismiss. The trial court did not err by denying the defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss based on preindictment delay because the defendant-appellant did meet his burden of establishing actual prejudice. | Zimmerman | Marion |
8/3/2026
|
8/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2988 |
|
State v. McMahan
| 17-25-19 | Res Judicata; R.C. 2953.21; Manifest Injustice; Crim.R. 32.1; Motion to Withdraw Pleas; Crim.R. 11(F); Motion for Transcript. Defendant's untimely assignments of error related to matters that could have been brought on a timely direct appeal or in a petition for postconviction relief are barred by res judicata. The trial court did not err by denying a hearing on a postsentence motion to withdraw a plea when defendant failed to make a sufficient showing of manifest injustice. The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a transcript at public expense when the motion was based on a Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw and not an appeal or a comparable postconviction proceeding. The trial court did not err in finding defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was untimely when the motion was based on allegations outside the record that were not filed as a timely R.C. 2953.21 motion for postconviction relief, and where undue delay affected the credibility of defendant under a Crim.R. 32.1 standard. | Miller | Shelby |
8/3/2026
|
8/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2992 |
|