Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 92 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Barga 17-17-14Sufficient evidence has been presented for forgery in violation of R.C. 2913.31(A)(3) when the State introduces some evidence that suggests the defendant has (1) uttered or possessed with the intent to utter any writing that the person knows to have been forged (2) with the purpose to defraud.WillamowskiShelby 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2804
State v. Wilson 13-17-41A waiver of the right to counsel in a misdemeanor case must be made on the record in open court and must be voluntary, knowing, and intelligent.WillamowskiSeneca 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2805
In re Petition for Adoption of H.R. 8-17-57The trial court did not error in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial or in finding that granting the petition for adoption was in the child’s best interest.ShawLogan 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2806
State v. Cheek 8-17-54The trial court did not err in sentencing the defendant-appellant to the maximum sentence. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.ZimmermanLogan 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2807
State v. Leugers 1-18-10Trial court erred by failing to properly advise defendant of post-release control at the sentencing hearing and then improperly imposing it in the sentencing entry. Matter remanded to the trial court to determine if defendant had completed his prison term or if he could be subjected to a limited resentencing.WillamowskiAllen 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2808
State v. Stuber 1-17-38Defendant-appellant’s driving-under-suspension conviction under R.C. 4510.111(A) is based on sufficient evidence.PrestonAllen 7/16/2018 7/16/2018 2018-Ohio-2809
In re K.B. 1-18-07Juvenile did not demonstrate ineffective assistance of counsel.ShawAllen 7/2/2018 7/2/2018 2018-Ohio-2619
State v. Rhoads 6-18-02Escape under R.C. 2921.34(A)(3) and failure to notify of change of address under R.C. 2950.05(F)(1) are offenses of dissimilar import and defendant-appellant can be convicted of both offenses. The trial court did not err by sentencing defendant-appellant without obtaining a new or updated presentence investigation because the trial court did not sentence defendant-appellant to a community-control sanction or probation.PrestonHardin 7/2/2018 7/2/2018 2018-Ohio-2620
State v. Stein 8-17-39Counsel was ineffective for not objecting to testimony regarding the fact that defendant was a thief and a drug dealer when the charges were unrelated to those prior bad acts. The State then argued that testimony as a basis for finding that the defendant was not entitled to a verdict of self-defense. Given that the remaining testimony was conflicting, the evidence is not overwhelming that a jury would have convicted the defendant. Thus, the appellant was prejudiced.WillamowskiLogan 7/2/2018 7/2/2018 2018-Ohio-2621
Hackathorne v. Hackathorne 14-17-13Trial court's shared parenting schedule and order regarding sale of marital residence was not an abuse of discretion.ShawUnion 7/2/2018 7/2/2018 2018-Ohio-2622
12345678910