Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 125 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Cheney 6-26-07Crim.R.11(C)(2); Maximum Sentences; Right to Remain Silent. Trial court did not err in informing defendant of the minimum and maximum sentences for an indefinite sentence. Trial court properly advised defendant he could not be compelled to testify against himself at a trial during the change of plea hearing.WillamowskiHardin 8/10/2026 8/10/2026 2026-Ohio-3062
State v. Short 11-25-12Manifest Weight; Waiver of Counsel; Misdemeanor Sentencing. The record demonstrated that defendant knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to counsel in misdemeanor bench trial. Conviction for violating a protection order was not against the weight of the evidence.WaldickPaulding 8/10/2026 8/10/2026 2026-Ohio-3063
State v. Carter 13-25-19, 13-25-20Manifest Weight; Ineffective Assistance. Convictions were not against the weight of the evidence. Trial counsel not ineffective for failing to file suppression motion.WaldickSeneca 8/3/2026 8/3/2026 2026-Ohio-2989
State v. Stith 9-25-41Preindictment delay, actual prejudice, due process, motion to dismiss. The trial court did not err by denying the defendant-appellant’s motion to dismiss based on preindictment delay because the defendant-appellant did meet his burden of establishing actual prejudice.ZimmermanMarion 8/3/2026 8/3/2026 2026-Ohio-2988
State v. McMahan 17-25-19Res Judicata; R.C. 2953.21; Manifest Injustice; Crim.R. 32.1; Motion to Withdraw Pleas; Crim.R. 11(F); Motion for Transcript. Defendant's untimely assignments of error related to matters that could have been brought on a timely direct appeal or in a petition for postconviction relief are barred by res judicata. The trial court did not err by denying a hearing on a postsentence motion to withdraw a plea when defendant failed to make a sufficient showing of manifest injustice. The trial court did not err in denying defendant's motion for a transcript at public expense when the motion was based on a Crim.R. 32.1 motion to withdraw and not an appeal or a comparable postconviction proceeding. The trial court did not err in finding defendant's motion to withdraw his plea was untimely when the motion was based on allegations outside the record that were not filed as a timely R.C. 2953.21 motion for postconviction relief, and where undue delay affected the credibility of defendant under a Crim.R. 32.1 standard.MillerShelby 8/3/2026 8/3/2026 2026-Ohio-2992
12345678910...>>