Opinion Search

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.

Opinion Text Search:

Source:

Year Decided From:

Year Decided To:

Year Decided Range Warning:

The selected 'Year Decided To:' is less than the selected 'Year Decided From:'.  Please select a 'To:' year newer than or equal to the 'From:' year.

County:

Case Number:

Author:

Topics and Issues:

WebCite No:

-Ohio-

Citation:

WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.

Hide Topics and Issues column This search returned 163 rows. Rows per page:

In re Adoption of K.F.A.

1-25-48

Contested Adoption; R.C. 3107.01(A); Failure to Provide for the Maintenance and Support of a Child; Justifiable Cause; Manifest Weight of the Evidence. The trial court’s determination that the biological mother-appellant was without justifiable cause for her failure to provide for the maintenance and support of the child during the one-year period immediately preceding the filing of the adoption petition is not against the manifest weight of the evidence.

Zimmerman

Allen

10/5/2026

2026-Ohio-3916

Elliott v. Jose

2-26-07

Medical Malpractice; Summary Judgment; reconsideration. Trial court properly granted summary judgment and denied reconsideration where appellant's expert did not establish proximate cause, or, in some cases, a duty of care.

Waldick

Auglaize

10/5/2026

2026-Ohio-3917

Montague v. Montague

5-26-01

Modification of Terms of Shared Parenting Plan; Best-Interest Factors under R.C. 3109.04(F)(1) and (2); Calculation of Child Support; Allocation of Court Costs and Guardian Ad Litem Fees; Abuse of Discretion. In this post-decree proceeding, the trial court’s decision to expand the parties’ existing shared parenting schedule to include Sunday overnights on each parent’s weekend was not an abuse of discretion. The trial court properly considered the best-interest factors under R.C. 3109.04(F)(1) and (2) in determining whether to modify the parties’ existing shared parenting schedule. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in the calculation of child support and by deviating the obligor’s child support amount to zero. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by ordering that court costs and guardian ad litem fees shall be equally paid by the parties.

Zimmerman

Hancock

10/5/2026

2026-Ohio-3918

State v. Bunn

7-26-04

Appellant did not express any issues with his attorney in open court, and, in fact, specifically indicated he was satisfied with his attorney.

Waldick

Henry

10/5/2026

2026-Ohio-3919

State v. Cobble

8-26-03

Inconsistent Sentencing; Termination of Community Control. The trial court erred by orally imposing a 30 month prison sentence and then imposing a 36 month prison sentence in the judgment entry. The trial court did not err in terminating community control when appellant admitted to the violations.

Willamowski

Logan

10/5/2026

2026-Ohio-3920

...