Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 108 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Wright 6-15-14The defendant-appellant's convictions for complicity to burglary and complicity to theft were based on sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence.PrestonHardin 8/22/2016 8/22/2016 2016-Ohio-5465
State v. Snuggs 7-16-03; 7-16-05The trial court did not err in failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law for the judgment denying appellant's post conviction motion to vacate his sentence when it was not filed timely. The trial court complied with criminal rule 11. Res judicata barred review of the claim that the convictions were for allied offenses of similar import. The trial court made the required findings to impose consecutive sentences. Counsel was not ineffective. The statute of limitations was not violated.WillamowskiHenry 8/22/2016 8/22/2016 2016-Ohio-5466
State v. Hawkey 4-14-03Clarification provided and the State's motion for reconsideration and certification are denied.WillamowskiDefiance 8/15/2016 8/15/2016 2016-Ohio-5369
State v. Eckard 9-15-45There is sufficient evidence that the defendant-appellant was the person who committed the burglary. The defendant-appellant's burglary conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence.PrestonMarion 8/1/2016 8/1/2016 2016-Ohio-5174
State v. Land 9-15-50Defendant-Appellant, Durain Land, appeals the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Marion County convicting him of one count of possession of heroin and one count of tampering with evidence and sentencing him to a period of eight years in prison. On appeal, Land argues that the trial court erred by sentencing him to a period that was inconsistent with sentences imposed for similar crimes and that his sentence served as a punishment for taking his case to trial. Further, Land argues that he was denied effective assistanceRogersMarion 8/1/2016 8/1/2016 2016-Ohio-5175
Zimpfer v. Roach 17-16-03Plaintiffs/Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Blake Zimpfer ("Blake") and Jody Keith ("Jody"), as legal guardian for Courtney Zimpfer ("Courtney") (collectively "Appellants"), appeal the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Shelby County, Probate Division, denying, in part, their motion to quash a subpoena issued by Defendants/Appellees/Cross-Appellants, Sandra Roach and Peggy Hall, individually and as co-executrixes of the estate of Robert Zimpfer ("the Decedent") (collectively "Appellees"). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.RogersShelby 8/1/2016 8/1/2016 2016-Ohio-5176
Lima Mem. Hosp. v. Almudallal 1-16-05, 1-16-11Intervenor-Appellant, St. Rita's Medical Center ("St. Rita's"), appeals the decision of the Court of Common Pleas of Allen County denying its motion for an amended protective order and granting Plaintiff-Appellee, Lima Memorial Hospital's ("Lima Memorial"), motion to compel. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.RogersAllen 8/1/2016 8/1/2016 2016-Ohio-5177
Wisner v. Wisner 5-15-31Plaintiff-Appellant, William E. Wisner ("Appellant"), appeals the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Hancock County, Probate Division, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees, John Wisner, as the Executor of Bonnie L. Fisher's estate ("the Executor"), Sharon Horvath, and David Wisner (collectively "Appellees"). On appeal, Appellant argues that the trial court erred in finding that (1) the doctrine of equitable estoppel does not apply in a will contest action under R.C. 2107.76 and (2) he lacked standing to request an accounting from the Executor, Fisher's attorney-in-fact. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. RogersHancock 7/25/2016 7/25/2016 2016-Ohio-5095
DeSalle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 5-16-02The trial court erred in finding that it did not have authority to quash a subpoena issued pursuant to another state's discovery request under R.C. 2913.09.ShawHancock 7/25/2016 7/25/2016 2016-Ohio-5096
O'Donnell v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co. 5-16-05The trial court erred in finding that it did not have authority to quash a subpoena issued pursuant to another state's discovery request under R.C. 2913.09.ShawHancock 7/25/2016 7/25/2016 2016-Ohio-5097
12345678910...>>