Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 158 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Wendel 14-16-08The trial court did not abuse its discretion by admitting testimony of the victim's mother because the testimony was not hearsay. It was not plain error for the trial court to allow the supposed hearsay testimony of the victim's brother. The defendant-appellant did not demonstrate that the trial court committed plain error by not excluding the mother's and brother's testimony under Evid.R. 403(A). The defendant-appellant did not demonstrate that the trial court committed plain error by not excluding the mother's and brother's testimony under Evid.R. 403(B). The trial court did not err by admitting evidence under Evid.R. 404(B); therefore, the defendant-appellant cannot demonstrate plain error. The trial court did not violate Evid.R. 614(B) in questioning a witness at a hearing.PrestonUnion 11/28/2016 11/28/2016 2016-Ohio-7915
State v. Bolen 13-16-01The trial court did not err in overruling Appellant's motion to suppress.ShawSeneca 11/21/2016 11/21/2016 2016-Ohio-7821
State v. Moloney 5-16-10The terms of community control imposed by the trial couryt were reasonablle and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in imposing them.WillamowskiHancock 11/21/2016 11/21/2016 2016-Ohio-7822
State v. Robinson 4-16-10, 4-16-11The judge issuing the search warrant had a substantial basis for concluding that probable cause existed to issue the warrant; therefore, the trial cort did not err in denying the defendant-appellant's motions to suppress evidencePrestonDefiance 11/21/2016 11/21/2016 2016-Ohio-7823
State v. Shreves 2-16-11Trial court's sentence was not clearly and convincingly contrary to law.ShawAuglaize 11/21/2016 11/21/2016 2016-Ohio-7824
State v. James 13-16-17Trial court did not err in denying the motion for acquittal. Defendant's transportation of drugs into the jail was voluntary when he failed to inform the officers of the drugs when arrested after repeated warnings of the consequences of failing to do so. Trial court did not err in denying the request for a jury instruction on voluntariness of Defendant's actions.WillamowskiSeneca 11/21/2016 11/21/2016 2016-Ohio-7825
State v. Herald 4-16-09Revocation of community control supported by record where defendant admitted to multiple violations.ShawDefiance 11/14/2016 11/14/2016 2016-Ohio-7733
Wilson v. Lyon 9-16-17The trial court did not err in granting the petition for a CSPO against appellant. However, the record does not support the trial court's inclusion of the appellee's husband as a person protected by the CSPO as the appellee failed to present evidence demonstrating that the appellant engaged in a violation of R.C. 2903.211 against the husband.ShawMarion 11/14/2016 11/14/2016 2016-Ohio-7734
State v. Vanausdal 17-16-06The trial court did not err in declining to merge the offenses of rape and pandering sexually oriented material involving a minor as allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2941.25(A). The trial court did not err in imposing consecutive sentences.PrestonShelby 11/14/2016 11/14/2016 2016-Ohio-7735
Loyer v. Signature Healthcare of Calion 3-16-09The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellants' motion to stay pending arbitration with regard to appellee's survivorship or wrongful-death claims.PrestonCrawford 11/14/2016 11/14/2016 2016-Ohio-7736
12345678910...>>