Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 3 rows. Rows per page: 
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
In re K.M.S. 9-15-37, 9-15-38, 9-15-39The record supports the trial court's decision to grant the Agency's motion for permanent custody of Appellants' children. The trial court's failure to specifically rule on Appellant-Mother's motion for legal custody as an alternative to permanent custody did not constitute reversible error.ShawMarion 1/17/2017 1/17/2017 2017-Ohio-142
State v. Plott 13-15-39, 13-15-40Sufficient evidence presented to support convictions for Rape, Abduction and Domestic Violence. Convictions not against the weight of the evidence. A number of claimed evidentiary errors either are not error or are harmless error.ShawSeneca 1/9/2017 1/9/2017 2017-Ohio-38
Polhamus v. Robinson 8-16-11The trial court did not abuse its discretion by concluding that there was no change in circumstances necessitating a modification of the parties' shared-custody agreement.PrestonLogan 1/9/2017 1/9/2017 2017-Ohio-39