Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Reporter of Decisions - Opinions & Announcements

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:    What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:   What is a Source?
Year Decided:   What is Year Decided?
County:   What is County?
Case Number:   What is Case Number?
Author:   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-   What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 92 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State v. Nevels 8-15-12Trial court did not err in denying the motion to suppress. The trial court did not err in denying the motion for judgment of acquittal when sufficient evidence was presented. The trial court did not err in imposing fees.WillamowskiLogan 6/20/2016 6/20/2016 2016-Ohio-3497
Meyers v. Chiaverini 7-16-01Municipal court's decision granting FED reversed because action was already pending in common pleas court. Dismissal of counterclaims and third-party complaint affirmed.ShawHenry 6/20/2016 6/20/2016 2016-Ohio-3498
State v. Walker 13-15-42Trial court erred in denying the motion for acquittal as to the element of the charge that it was committed in the vicinity of a juvenile when no evidence was presented as to this specification. Defendant was not denied the effective assistance of counsel.WillamowskiSeneca 6/20/2016 6/20/2016 2016-Ohio-3499
Sayre v. Furgeson 17-15-16The trial court did not err in adopting the recommendations of the magistrate on father's motion for change of custody and in denying mother's request for findings of fact and conclusions of law.WillamowskiShelby 6/20/2016 6/20/2016 2016-Ohio-3500
Figley v. Ivex Protective Packaging, Inc. 17-16-02The trial court did not err in granting defendant-appellee's motion to dismiss plaintiff-appellant's amended complaint based on a lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant-appellee. Plaintiff-appellant's assignment of error challenging the trial court's summary judgment concerning plaintiff-appellee's subrogation interest is moot.PrestonShelby 6/20/2016 6/20/2016 2016-Ohio-3501
State v. Koehler 16-15-10The defendant-appellant's waiver of trial counsel was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary because the trial court substantially complied with the requirements of Crim.R. 44(A) by making sufficient inquiry to determine the defendant-appellant fully understand and intelligently relinquished her right to counsel and by obtaining a written waiver. The defendant-appellant's sentence is clearly and convincingly contrary to law because the trial court explicitly impose a prison sentence and community-control sanctions for the same offense.PrestonWyandot 6/13/2016 6/13/2016 2016-Ohio-3384
Merriman v. Merriman 11-15-10The trial court did not abuse its discretion by designating defendant-appellee as the child's residential parent for school purposes.PrestonPaulding 6/13/2016 6/13/2016 2016-Ohio-3385
State v. Costell 14-15-11The defendant-appellant's aggravated-murder conviction is based on sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The prosecutor did not engage in misconduct during any phase of trial. The defendant-appellant's trial counsel was not ineffective during any phase of trial. The trial court did not commit structural error by instructing the parties to present opening statements prior to voir dire. The trial court did not err in the admission of evidence, including the victim's death certificate.PrestonUnion 6/13/2016 6/13/2016 2016-Ohio-3386
Middleton v. Holbrook 9-15-47The trial court failed to properly analyze the element of duty in the plaintiff's claim and incorrectly observed that the issues of proximate causation and the right of way were undisputed. Therefore, summary judgment was improperly granted.WillamowskiMarion 6/13/2016 6/13/2016 2016-Ohio-3387
State v. Sturgis 10-15-17Mandatory sentence for attempted illegal manufacture of drugs was not contrary to law.WillamowskiMercer 6/13/2016 6/13/2016 2016-Ohio-3388
12345678910