|
|
In re R.W.
| 26CA4180 | Permanent custody-Trial court's judgment placing child in the agency's permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence-Judgment affirmed. | Abele | Scioto |
8/26/2026
|
9/2/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3433 |
|
In re W.C.
| 26CA1244, 26CA1247 | Permanent custody-Trial court's judgment placing child in the agency's permanent custody was not against the manifest weight of the evidence-Judgment affirmed. | Abele | Adams |
8/26/2026
|
9/2/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3431 |
|
State v. Miller
| 25CA7 | Appellant entered a knowing, intelligent, and voluntary plea. | Abele | Jackson |
8/26/2026
|
9/2/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3432 |
|
State v. McCormick
| 24CA11 | CRIMINAL-EXCITED UTTERANCE-CONFRONTATION CLAUSE - The victim's statements regarding ongoing sexual abuse and her fear of returning home that were made in response to questions by school officials were properly admitted pursuant to the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule; the admission of the victim's out-of-court statements did not violate the confrontation clause where the victim testified at trial and was subject to full and fair cross-examination and where their admission alternatively constituted harmless error; appellant's convictions for 28 counts of rape were supported by sufficient evidence and were not against the manifest weight of the evidence. | Smith | Gallia |
8/26/2026
|
9/9/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3528 |
|
State v. Mackey
| 25CA17 | CRIMINAL-CONTEMPT-CONSECUTIVE SENTENCE - Trial court did not abuse its discretion or commit plain error by finding appellant to be in direct contempt of court by appearing at initial sentencing impaired; trial court did not commit plain error in ordering appellant's contempt sanction to be served consecutive to the underlying felony sentence because to allow the sentences to be served concurrently would carry no practical consequences for contemptuous conduct. | Smith | Washington |
8/25/2026
|
9/3/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3437 |
|