|
|
State v. Redmond
| 24CA42 | Crim.R. 32(A); a trial court has discretion when to pronounce a sentence; an unreasonable delay in sentencing deprives a court of jurisdiction to impose a sentence | Wilkin | Ross |
6/11/2026
|
6/24/2026
| 2026-Ohio-1348 |
|
State v. Rogers
| 25CA10, 25CA13 | The trial court did not commit plain error when it imposed consecutive sentences and did not violate the appellant's Fifth, Fourteenth, or Eighth Amendment rights. | Abele | Ross |
6/11/2026
|
6/16/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2277 |
|
State v. McKnight
| 25CA14 , 25CA15 | Criminal law-Burglary and felonious assault-The State presented sufficient evidence to support appellant's burglary conviction and his conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence-Appellant's felonious assault conviction wsa not against the manifest weight of the evidence simply becasue the jury chose to believe the State's version of events rather than appellat's claim of self-defense-Judgment affirmed. | Abele | Lawrence |
6/9/2026
|
6/18/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2346 |
|
State v. A.K.
| 25CA1218 | Criminal law-R.C. 2945.481-Trial court did not err by allowing child victim to testify outside the courtroom-Crim.R. 16-Discovery violation-Trial court did not abuse its discretion by declining to dismiss the indictment when nothing suggested that the discovery violation was willful-Crim.R. 7-trial court did not abuse its discretion by amending the indictment to expand the time frame within which the offenses allegedly occurred-Sufficiency of the evidence-the State presented sufficient evidence to establish that the victim suffered serious physical harm as a result of felonious assault-The evidence showed that the victim suffered from multiple mental health conditions that required ongoing treatment-Manifest weight of the evidence-the jury's finding that the victim suffered serious physical harm was not against the manifest weight of the evidence-Sentencing-R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c)-Trial court's failure to provide R.C. 2929.19(B)(2)(c) notifications constituted plain error and required remand for resentencing when State conceded error-Judgment affirmed in part and remanded in part | Abele | Adams |
6/9/2026
|
6/15/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2261 |
|
State v. Withers
| 25CA16 | Criminal law-Evid.R. 404(B) does not prohibit evidence of a dog's prior attack-Evid.R. 404(B) applies to a person, not to a dog-Evidence regarding a dog's prior attack was relevant in a prosecution involving R.C. 955.22 and was not unfairly prejudicial-Evidence was sufficient to support appellant's involuntary-manslaughter and R.C. 955.22 convictions when the evidence showed that appellant's dogs escaped the house and killed a person-Trial counsel was not ineffective-Judgment affirmed. | Abele | Pickaway |
6/9/2026
|
6/17/2026
| 2026-Ohio-2290 |
|