Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 194 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State ex rel. Luster v. Reger WD-26-035Writ of prohibition. Jurisdiction. Adequate remedy at law.DuhartWood 8/18/2026 8/18/2026 2026-Ohio-3193
State v. Thompson L-25-00176Trial court did not err in accepting a guilty plea entered under North Carolina v. Alford where the State supplied a basic factual framework for the charges; Ohio law does not require the State to identify the evidentiary source of each recited fact. Counsel was not ineffective, absent a record showing deficient performance or prejudice. Sentence on the first-degree felony kidnapping count is contrary to law where the court imposed a definite rather than indefinite term under R.C. 2929.14(A)(1)(a).SulekLucas 8/18/2026 8/18/2026 2026-Ohio-3194
Turski v. Lanzinger L-26-00170Per Osowik, J., because relator failed to abide by R.C. 2731.04, which requires that applications for writs of mandamus must be “by petition, in the name of the state on the relation of the person applying,” this court must dismiss this action. See Blankenship v. Blackwell, 2004-Ohio-5596, ¶ 36.OsowikLucas 8/18/2026 8/18/2026 2026-Ohio-3195
State v. Wright E-25-027Per Osowik, J., Trial court failed to make the R. C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings at the community control revocation hearing; trial court also failed to provide post-release control notifications pursuant to R.C. 2929.19(B)(2) (e); Remand for re-hearing and to permit allocution by appellant.OsowikErie 8/18/2026 8/18/2026 2026-Ohio-3198
In re Spoerl v. Wiseman WD-25-067; WD-25-068Zmuda, J., writing for the majority affirms the judgment, granting summary judgment in favor of the Wood County Treasurer, and ordering foreclosure to collect delinquent property taxes under R.C. 5721.18.ZmudaWood 8/18/2026 8/18/2026 2026-Ohio-3197
12345678910...>>