|
|
State v. Moses
| L-25-00261 | Per Mayle, J., R.C. 2923.111 and 2923.12 are not unconstitutional as applied. While statutes permit only “qualifying adults” to carry concealed handgun, and person adjudicated delinquent for committing domestic violence is not a “qualifying adult,” statutes do not restrict open carry, thus defendant’s Second-Amendment right to bear arms was not violated. Record lacks evidence that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to file suppression motion. | Mayle | Lucas |
11/13/2026
|
11/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4513 |
|
In re M.T.
| WD-26-014 | Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, affirms the trial court’s order placing M.T. in the legal custody of her grandmother and granting parenting time to her father. | Zmuda | Wood |
11/13/2026
|
11/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4511 |
|
Obu v. State Med. Bd.
| L-26-00037 | Per Mayle, J., based on the findings that plaintiff-appellant Obu admits “were correct,” the State Medical Board of Ohio had clear legal authority under R.C. 4731.22(B)(10) to permanently revoke his medical license. For this reason, the trial court was precluded from modifying the penalty imposed. Our limited scope of review does not permit us to substitute our judgment for the Board’s and accordingly, the Judgment Entry of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. | Mayle | Lucas |
11/13/2026
|
11/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4514 |
|
1643 Limited, L.L.C. v. Shades of Nantucket Unit Owners Assn.
| E-25-054 | Per Mayle, J., state was not a necessary party to the underlying lawsuit, so trial court had jurisdiction to issue its decisions. Trial court erred by granting summary judgment to appellee regarding property on peninsula. Because summary judgment on peninsula property was improper, trial court’s ejectment and injunction decisions related to peninsula property must be vacated. Trial court incorrectly awarded injunction relating to beach property without any evidence. | Mayle | Erie |
11/13/2026
|
11/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4515 |
|
Kruzyk v. Palmer
| E-26-004 | Per Mayle, J., trial court abused its discretion when it required expert testimony to support breach-of-contract claim where it was undisputed that mechanic failed to install fuel filter as agreed. Plaintiff’s claim that mechanic caused damage to car while performing repairs was a claim for negligent repair—not breach of contract—and was not supported by reliable evidence. | Mayle | Erie |
11/13/2026
|
11/13/2026
| 2026-Ohio-4512 |
|