Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here.
Opinion Text Search:
   What is Opinion Text Search?
Source:
   What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:
   What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:
   What is County?
Case Number:
   What is Case Number?
Author:
   What is Author?
Topics and Issues:
   What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No:
-Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.?
Citation:
   What is Citation?
WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
This search returned 178 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
State ex rel. Heller v. Warden, Northwest Ohio Corr. Ctr. WM-26-004$500,000 pretrial bond not excessive where defendant allegedly attempted to murder the victim with a gun after breaking into his residence.SulekWilliams 7/21/2026 7/21/2026 2026-Ohio-2795
WBL SPO I, L.L.C. v. Farraj S-25-034Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for leave to file amended complaint where appellant acted with undue delay. Trial court did not err in granting summary judgment dismissing appellant’s complaint in foreclosure and on appellees’ counterclaim for declaration that mortgage against property was invalid because appellee presented uncontroverted evidence that party who executed mortgage documents did not have authority to bind property owner.SulekSandusky 7/21/2026 7/21/2026 2026-Ohio-2800
State v. Fench L-25-00140Zmuda. Defendant waived his rights to a speedy trial upon entering his guilty plea.ZmudaLucas 7/21/2026 7/21/2026 2026-Ohio-2794
In re A.B. L-26-00019Per Mayle, J., appellant does not challenge the trial court’s findings under R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(d), (E)(2), or (E)(4), which are sufficient to support the court’s award of permanent custody to the children services agency.MayleLucas 7/14/2026 7/14/2026 2026-Ohio-2691
Toledo v. SL Hauling & Renovation, L.L.C. L-25-00226Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, finds that the trial court had subject matter jurisdiction over appellees’ request for permanent injunction. Appellants waived their constitutional claims and lack of service defense. Trial Court did not err in consolidating the preliminary and permanent injunction proceedings. The City was not obligated to exhaust its administrative remedies prior to seeking an injunction. The trial court erred when it extended the closure of appellants’ premises for a period exceeding one year in violation of the Toledo Municipal Code.ZmudaLucas 7/14/2026 7/15/2026 2026-Ohio-2700
12345678910...>>