Seal of the State of Ohio. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page. Line Drawing of the Ohio Judicial Center. Click here to return to the Supreme Court home page.
Spacer image

The Supreme Court of Ohio & The Ohio Judicial System

Opinion Search Filter Settings
Use standard search logic for the Opinion Text Search (full-text search). To search the entire web site click here
Opinion Text Search:   What is Opinion Text Search?
Search Truncation Warning:
Source:    What is a Source?
Year Decided From:
Year Decided To:    What is Year Decided?
Year Decided Range Warning:
County:    What is County?
Case Number:    What is Case Number?
Author:    What is Author?
Topics and Issues:    What are Topics and Issues?
WebCite No: -Ohio-    What is a Web Cite No.? WebCite and Citation are unique document searches. If a value is entered in the WebCite or Citation field, all other search filters are ignored. If values are entered in both the WebCite and Citation fields, only the WebCite search filter is applied.
Citation:    What is Citation?
This search returned 184 rows. Rows per page: 
12345678910...>>
Case CaptionCase No.Topics and IssuesAuthorCitation / CountyDecidedPostedWebCite
Mitchell v. Chessar L-18-1018Toledo Municipal Court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over a wage garnishment proceeding in which the parties were not residents of Toledo and the events that formed the basis of the matter took place outside of the territorial jurisdiction of the court.JensenLucas 7/13/2018 7/13/2018 2018-Ohio-2757
In re C.P. L-18-1020Juvenile court’s grant of permanent custody of appellant’s minor children to children’s services agency is not against the manifest weight of the evidence, where the services offered to appellant under her case plan, which appellant failed to utilize, support the trial court’s finding that the agency made reasonable efforts to prevent the removal of the children from the home.JensenLucas 7/13/2018 7/13/2018 2018-Ohio-2758
In re D.J. L-18-1010Granting permanent custody to the agency was supported by evidence that the children could not or should not be placed with the father within a reasonable period of time, R.C. 2151.414(B)(1)(a), and was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence.SingerLucas 7/13/2018 7/13/2018 2018-Ohio-2759
In re Dor.B. WD-18-013The trial court’s decision to terminate appellants’ parental rights was supported by the manifest weight of the evidence. Clear and convincing evidence supported the trial court’s findings that the children cannot or should not be placed with either parent in a reasonable time and that awarding permanent custody to the children services agency was in the children’s best interest. The trial court erred in admitting certain exhibits, but the error was harmless because the information was cumulative.MayleWood 7/9/2018 7/9/2018 2018-Ohio-2666
State v. Adkins WD-16-042Trial court erred in the conviction of appellant for murder as a result of appellant demonstrating actual prejudice for the preindictment delay and appellee failing to demonstrate justification. Judgment reversed and conviction vacated.OsowikWood 6/29/2018 6/29/2018 2018-Ohio-2588
State v. Cousino S-17-033Trial court failed to make all required findings under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) before imposing consecutive sentences, requiring reversal and remand for new sentencing hearing.MayleSandusky 6/29/2018 6/29/2018 2018-Ohio-2589
State v. Wenner S-18-004Potential assignment of error exists where trial court may not have complied with R.C. 2929.13(B)(1). Anders briefs prohibited in criminal appeals.SingerSandusky 6/29/2018 6/29/2018 2018-Ohio-2590
State v. Skiles L-17-1030This is a brief submitted pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). After a thorough and independent examination of the record, the judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed, in part, and reversed, in part.OsowikLucas 6/29/2018 6/29/2018 2018-Ohio-2591
Toledo v. Jackson Industries Corp. L-17-1135, L-17-1136, L-17-1137Insufficient evidence. Nuisance. Abate. Urban farming.SingerLucas 6/29/2018 6/29/2018 2018-Ohio-2592
Sate v. Caldwell L-17-1054The judgment of the Lucas County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed.OsowikLucas 6/29/2018 6/29/2018 2018-Ohio-2593
12345678910...>>