|
|
State ex rel. Luster v. Reger
| WD-26-035 | Writ of prohibition. Jurisdiction. Adequate remedy at law. | Duhart | Wood |
8/18/2026
|
8/18/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3193 |
|
State v. Thompson
| L-25-00176 | Trial court did not err in accepting a guilty plea entered under North Carolina v. Alford where the State supplied a basic factual framework for the charges; Ohio law does not require the State to identify the evidentiary source of each recited fact. Counsel was not ineffective, absent a record showing deficient performance or prejudice. Sentence on the first-degree felony kidnapping count is contrary to law where the court imposed a definite rather than indefinite term under R.C. 2929.14(A)(1)(a). | Sulek | Lucas |
8/18/2026
|
8/18/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3194 |
|
Turski v. Lanzinger
| L-26-00170 | Per Osowik, J., because relator failed to abide by R.C. 2731.04, which requires that applications for writs of mandamus must be “by petition, in the name of the state on the relation of the person applying,” this court must dismiss this action. See Blankenship v. Blackwell, 2004-Ohio-5596, ¶ 36. | Osowik | Lucas |
8/18/2026
|
8/18/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3195 |
|
State v. Wright
| E-25-027 | Per Osowik, J., Trial court failed to make the R. C. 2929.14(C)(4) findings at the community control revocation hearing; trial court also failed to provide post-release control notifications pursuant to R.C. 2929.19(B)(2) (e); Remand for re-hearing and to permit allocution by appellant. | Osowik | Erie |
8/18/2026
|
8/18/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3198 |
|
In re Spoerl v. Wiseman
| WD-25-067; WD-25-068 | Zmuda, J., writing for the majority affirms the judgment, granting summary judgment in favor of the Wood County Treasurer, and ordering foreclosure to collect delinquent property taxes under R.C. 5721.18. | Zmuda | Wood |
8/18/2026
|
8/18/2026
| 2026-Ohio-3197 |
|